The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Types of benefits | Benefits package | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mali: Mutuelles |
|
The social protection policy aims to have the three systems cover the same services. The laws and decrees assured consistency in the services between the AMO and RAMED when the two organizations were founded. Read full sectionThe social protection policy aims to have the three systems cover the same services. The laws and decrees assured consistency in the services between the AMO and RAMED when the two organizations were founded. For the Mutuelles, payment for services is not yet consistent. The risks that the Mutuelles cover as they exist today in Mali are paid for partially or completely for the following:
Most Mutuelles limit themselves to the services provided at the first level of contact, which is the community health center (CSCOM), where patients receive the first level of care, but not for the more costly risks. The national Mutuelle extension strategy seeks to bridge this gap through the Mutuelle Support Fund by paying for care at the secondary and tertiary levels. With regard to standardizing the services that are covered, the starting point is the package of services covered by the AMO and RAMED, with certain modifications possible for more comprehensive coverage of preventive care, in particular for reproductive health. Table 3: Package of services covered, 2010
Source: Ministry of Social Protection MutuellesBenefits package Types of Benefits: Comprehensive The social protection policy aims to have the three systems cover the same services. The laws and decrees assured consistency in the services between the AMO and RAMED when the two organizations were founded. For the Mutuelles, payment for services is not yet consistent. The risks that the Mutuelles cover as they exist today in Mali are paid for partially or completely for the following:
Most Mutuelles limit themselves to the services provided at the first level of contact, which is the community health center (CSCOM), where patients receive the first level of care, but not for the more costly risks. The national Mutuelle extension strategy seeks to bridge this gap through the Mutuelle Support Fund by paying for care at the secondary and tertiary levels. With regard to standardizing the services that are covered, the starting point is the package of services covered by the AMO and RAMED, with certain modifications possible for more comprehensive coverage of preventive care, in particular for reproductive health. Table 3: Package of services covered, 2010
Source: Ministry of Social Protection |
||||||||||||
| Mexico: Seguro Popular |
|
The design of the Seguro Popular essential benefits package was informed by two key sets of analytical inputs. The first set of analytical tools was composed of estimates of the burden of disease used to assess the severity of different health problems. The second set was made up of cost-effectiveness analyses used to weigh the potential population-level benefits of distinct interventions against their financial costs. The first benefits package was selected in 2002 and consisted of 78 health interventions. These interventions included primarily preventive activities as well as the detection and treatment of degenerative diseases. Read full sectionThe design of the Seguro Popular essential benefits package was informed by two key sets of analytical inputs. The first set of analytical tools was composed of estimates of the burden of disease used to assess the severity of different health problems. The second set was made up of cost-effectiveness analyses used to weigh the potential population-level benefits of distinct interventions against their financial costs. The first benefits package was selected in 2002 and consisted of 78 health interventions. These interventions included primarily preventive activities as well as the detection and treatment of degenerative diseases. In 2004, the number of interventions increased to 91 and by 2005 the number increased to 155. In 2006-2007, the number of covered interventions increased significantly up to 255 interventions, covering most causes of primary care visits and nearly 95% of all causes of hospital admissions. As of 2009, there were 266 interventions that were covered under the Universal Catalog of Health Services (CAUSES). The benefits package can be divided into six distinct categories of services as follows:
There is also a distinct benefits package for protection against catastrophic expenditures. This centrally managed fund, known as the Protection Fund Against Catastrophic Expenditures (FPGC) covered 17 interventions in 2006. By 2010, the number of interventions grew to 49 and included treatment for HIV/AIDS, bone marrow transplant, and childhood cancer. Care for most of these catastrophic events (84%) is provided by private service providers. Seguro PopularBenefits package Types of Benefits: Comprehensive The design of the Seguro Popular essential benefits package was informed by two key sets of analytical inputs. The first set of analytical tools was composed of estimates of the burden of disease used to assess the severity of different health problems. The second set was made up of cost-effectiveness analyses used to weigh the potential population-level benefits of distinct interventions against their financial costs. The first benefits package was selected in 2002 and consisted of 78 health interventions. These interventions included primarily preventive activities as well as the detection and treatment of degenerative diseases. In 2004, the number of interventions increased to 91 and by 2005 the number increased to 155. In 2006-2007, the number of covered interventions increased significantly up to 255 interventions, covering most causes of primary care visits and nearly 95% of all causes of hospital admissions. As of 2009, there were 266 interventions that were covered under the Universal Catalog of Health Services (CAUSES). The benefits package can be divided into six distinct categories of services as follows:
There is also a distinct benefits package for protection against catastrophic expenditures. This centrally managed fund, known as the Protection Fund Against Catastrophic Expenditures (FPGC) covered 17 interventions in 2006. By 2010, the number of interventions grew to 49 and included treatment for HIV/AIDS, bone marrow transplant, and childhood cancer. Care for most of these catastrophic events (84%) is provided by private service providers. |