UHC Forward: Towards Universal Health Coverage

In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008.

Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers.

While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788.

An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009.

Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies.

Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR.

Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement.

Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA.

FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories.

In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations.

Table 1: Individuals covered per category

Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106

Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The scheme has been implemented in all districts in the state. Upon enrollment, beneficiary households receive a Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Card, a mechanism through which patients are identified and medical records are kept. Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The state already had a mechanism for defining, identifying, and enrolling below-the-poverty-line families. Each eligible family is issued a “White Card” (a ration card) to identify them as below-the-poverty line. Aarogyasri uses the “White Card” as a targeting mechanism for its scheme.

Families in the state who already have “White Cards” are provided with Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Cards. Everyone in a household can be included in the Rajiv Aarogyasri Health Card. This means the head of the family, spouse, dependent children, and dependent parents. The Health Card captures the family’s data and pictures of each family member. It is presented by beneficiaries when they arrive at a health facility to identify them. The card is also used to store patient visit records and transmit utilization information.

Once enrolled, beneficiaries are guided through the process of seeking care. In order to ensure that beneficiaries know what benefits they are entitled to, and are able to navigate the system of care, Aarogyasri has developed a team of 4,000 Aarogya Mithras. Aarogya Mithras are health workers representing the community of the insured. One Aarogya Mithra sits in each primary health center across the state. These health centers are most often the first points of contact for most families seeking care. In addition, district hospitals and network hospitals also have help desks manned by Aarogya Mithras to facilitate smooth service delivery for Aarogyasri beneficiaries. Aarogya Mithras help to guide beneficiaries through the network of care and inform them about their insurance benefits.

In addition to contacts with Aarogya Mithras, beneficiaries can visit health screening camps that are set up by network providers in rural areas. Under the scheme, all network hospitals are required to undertake a specified number of village health camps in order to maintain their network status. Beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries attend the health camps to be screened for diseases and are provided with preventive care. Those that can be treated at the camp are treated; those that require further treatment are referred to network hospitals where their ailment will be treated free of cost under their Aarogyasri benefits. As of November 2009, there have been more than 15,000 camps and nearly 2.5 million people have been screened.