The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Target population | Coverage | Population covered | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vietnam: Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance Schemes |
|
36.5 million |
It is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. Read full sectionIt is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. When the SHI program initially began, only large employers were required to enroll their workers in the scheme. However, in 2005 the government expanded the mandate to companies of all sizes. Of Vietnam’s 7.7 million formal sector workers, 4.8 million (63%) are in the contributory scheme, but 2 million formal sector workers (26%) remain without coverage. Furthermore, SHI enrollment appears to be higher among the “better-off,” while middle-income groups currently have the lowest enrollment rates. Under the VHI, until the end of 2009, full-time students were typically enrolled en masse by insurance agents operating at schools and colleges. As of January 2010, full-time students are automatically enrolled as a part of the CHI. Family members/dependents of the compulsorily insured can enroll in the VSS scheme of their own accord. Others can enroll through group organizations, including communes. Prior to 2007, dependents were required to enroll all household members together and group organizations required a 20% minimum rate of participation. However, these stipulations have since been eliminated. Nonetheless, voluntary enrollment among the non-student population has stayed low with no signs of improvement. Enrollment in HCFP is a bit more complex. Provinces are tasked with identifying beneficiaries under the target groups. Identification has not been a challenge for at least two of the target groups, as communes and ethnic minority households are well documented. In the case of poor households, who have proved to be the most difficult group to identify, local governments begin by building upon lists of officially poor households produced for other government programs. Then commune officials conduct further household surveys to produce a proposed list of HCFP beneficiaries, which is then discussed and voted upon at a public meeting presided over by the village or commune leader. Officials from the district government’s labor and social affairs offices (MOLISA) then review the list, which can be revised before it is sent to the provincial department of labor and social affairs for final approval. Until recently, provinces were free to decide whether to enroll HCFP beneficiaries in the government’s SHI program, or to manage the risk themselves and provide direct reimbursement to providers. However, this latter option, which was initially the most popular with provinces, has since been phased out through a 2005 government directive updating Decision 139. According new Health Insurance Law, effective since July, 2009, the poor are included in the compulsory health insurance program. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by compulsory health insurance. Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance SchemesPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 36.5 million It is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. When the SHI program initially began, only large employers were required to enroll their workers in the scheme. However, in 2005 the government expanded the mandate to companies of all sizes. Of Vietnam’s 7.7 million formal sector workers, 4.8 million (63%) are in the contributory scheme, but 2 million formal sector workers (26%) remain without coverage. Furthermore, SHI enrollment appears to be higher among the “better-off,” while middle-income groups currently have the lowest enrollment rates. Under the VHI, until the end of 2009, full-time students were typically enrolled en masse by insurance agents operating at schools and colleges. As of January 2010, full-time students are automatically enrolled as a part of the CHI. Family members/dependents of the compulsorily insured can enroll in the VSS scheme of their own accord. Others can enroll through group organizations, including communes. Prior to 2007, dependents were required to enroll all household members together and group organizations required a 20% minimum rate of participation. However, these stipulations have since been eliminated. Nonetheless, voluntary enrollment among the non-student population has stayed low with no signs of improvement. Enrollment in HCFP is a bit more complex. Provinces are tasked with identifying beneficiaries under the target groups. Identification has not been a challenge for at least two of the target groups, as communes and ethnic minority households are well documented. In the case of poor households, who have proved to be the most difficult group to identify, local governments begin by building upon lists of officially poor households produced for other government programs. Then commune officials conduct further household surveys to produce a proposed list of HCFP beneficiaries, which is then discussed and voted upon at a public meeting presided over by the village or commune leader. Officials from the district government’s labor and social affairs offices (MOLISA) then review the list, which can be revised before it is sent to the provincial department of labor and social affairs for final approval. Until recently, provinces were free to decide whether to enroll HCFP beneficiaries in the government’s SHI program, or to manage the risk themselves and provide direct reimbursement to providers. However, this latter option, which was initially the most popular with provinces, has since been phased out through a 2005 government directive updating Decision 139. According new Health Insurance Law, effective since July, 2009, the poor are included in the compulsory health insurance program. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by compulsory health insurance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
40,835,265 |
In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Read full sectionIn both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. General System of Social Security in HealthPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 40,835,265 In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mali: Mutuelles |
|
400,000 |
The Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. Read full sectionThe Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. The main challenge in promoting the Mutuelle movement for large-scale enrollment thus continues to be implementing a major information and awareness campaign for Mutuelles at the national scale. This is part of the national strategy and advocacy activities that also include local and national leaders . Since the AMO is mandatory, beneficiaries are enrolled automatically by withdrawing dues from their wages. Benefit eligibility begins on May 1, 2011 for those who have paid dues for six months. With regard to identifying the indigent for RAMED, the social services in each commune routinely conduct a social survey to assess the situation after interested parties submit an application. The social services or other persons may also prepare an application on behalf of someone else who has not taken the initiative to do so for several reasons. Based on the social survey, the communal authorities issue an indigent card that serves as physical evidence to enroll the member and to obtain the card from the National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM – the management agency for RAMED) and to obtain care (including the beneficiaries whose applications are submitted to ANAM staff). The status of indigence is always considered temporary, so that the insured member’s card is annual. MutuellesPopulation covered Target Populations: Informal Sector
Coverage Level: 400,000 The Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. The main challenge in promoting the Mutuelle movement for large-scale enrollment thus continues to be implementing a major information and awareness campaign for Mutuelles at the national scale. This is part of the national strategy and advocacy activities that also include local and national leaders . Since the AMO is mandatory, beneficiaries are enrolled automatically by withdrawing dues from their wages. Benefit eligibility begins on May 1, 2011 for those who have paid dues for six months. With regard to identifying the indigent for RAMED, the social services in each commune routinely conduct a social survey to assess the situation after interested parties submit an application. The social services or other persons may also prepare an application on behalf of someone else who has not taken the initiative to do so for several reasons. Based on the social survey, the communal authorities issue an indigent card that serves as physical evidence to enroll the member and to obtain the card from the National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM – the management agency for RAMED) and to obtain care (including the beneficiaries whose applications are submitted to ANAM staff). The status of indigence is always considered temporary, so that the insured member’s card is annual. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile: National Health Fund (FONASA) |
|
11 million |
Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. Read full sectionEnrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 National Health Fund (FONASA)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 11 million Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Korea, Rep.: National Health Insurance Program |
|
50 million |
All South Koreans are eligible and required to have health coverage under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP). NHIP is managed by the National Health Insurance Corporation, which is responsible for enrollment and communication. NHIC uses local branches to enroll individuals and to collect premiums. The insured are divided into two groups: employee insured and self-employed insured. The employee insured category composes about 59% of the total number of insured. Read full sectionAll South Koreans are eligible and required to have health coverage under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP). NHIP is managed by the National Health Insurance Corporation, which is responsible for enrollment and communication. NHIC uses local branches to enroll individuals and to collect premiums. The insured are divided into two groups: employee insured and self-employed insured. The employee insured category composes about 59% of the total number of insured. Those in the self-employed insured category include about 41% of the total insured population.
National Health Insurance ProgramPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 50 million All South Koreans are eligible and required to have health coverage under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP). NHIP is managed by the National Health Insurance Corporation, which is responsible for enrollment and communication. NHIC uses local branches to enroll individuals and to collect premiums. The insured are divided into two groups: employee insured and self-employed insured. The employee insured category composes about 59% of the total number of insured. Those in the self-employed insured category include about 41% of the total insured population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria: National Health Insurance System |
|
5 million |
Health insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. Read full sectionHealth insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. In the Informal Sector Program, the self-employed and individuals living in rural communities enroll themselves. The self-employed must join with at least 500 other members who are occupation based (ie: taxi drivers) to qualify. Rural dwellers have a similar modus operandi, but participants need to belong to the same community rather than the same occupational group. These Social Health Insurance Schemes are self-governed, with elections held to determine who will represent the community. In order to stay enrolled, members are expected to make a monthly contribution actuarially determined based on the benefits package of their choice. Participants requiring specialist or longer treatment would need to pay for the balance from what they are entitled from the common pool. These schemes are expected to cover more than 60% of the rural and self-employed population, though due to poor data collection, the exact population enrolled is difficult to determine. The enrollment levels in private insurance is uncertain, but based on submissions from private insurers to NHIS, less than 1 million people are privately insured. The NHIS utilizes 61 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) as health managers for paying healthcare providers, quality assurance, and registration of enrollees and sensitization of participants as part of improving transparency of the system. HMOs contract with the NHIS to manage the enrollment of individuals in health insurance schemes; to collect their payments; pay the healthcare providers; and to provide basic quality management of the health insurance scheme that covers formal employees. National Health Insurance SystemPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 5 million Health insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. In the Informal Sector Program, the self-employed and individuals living in rural communities enroll themselves. The self-employed must join with at least 500 other members who are occupation based (ie: taxi drivers) to qualify. Rural dwellers have a similar modus operandi, but participants need to belong to the same community rather than the same occupational group. These Social Health Insurance Schemes are self-governed, with elections held to determine who will represent the community. In order to stay enrolled, members are expected to make a monthly contribution actuarially determined based on the benefits package of their choice. Participants requiring specialist or longer treatment would need to pay for the balance from what they are entitled from the common pool. These schemes are expected to cover more than 60% of the rural and self-employed population, though due to poor data collection, the exact population enrolled is difficult to determine. The enrollment levels in private insurance is uncertain, but based on submissions from private insurers to NHIS, less than 1 million people are privately insured. The NHIS utilizes 61 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) as health managers for paying healthcare providers, quality assurance, and registration of enrollees and sensitization of participants as part of improving transparency of the system. HMOs contract with the NHIS to manage the enrollment of individuals in health insurance schemes; to collect their payments; pay the healthcare providers; and to provide basic quality management of the health insurance scheme that covers formal employees. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philippines: PhilHealth |
|
75 million |
PhilHealth coverage is theoretically available to the entire population. The enrollment process differs based on the population group. For example, all formal sector workers must enroll at the start of employment. Read full sectionPhilHealth coverage is theoretically available to the entire population. The enrollment process differs based on the population group. For example, all formal sector workers must enroll at the start of employment. The poor are identified and enrolled by the local government. The population is tagged to one of the four major population categorizations:
The benefits package is essentially the same for each population group. The exception is for indigents and the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) who have additional outpatient primary care benefits (with the providers paid by capitation) however these benefits are available only through public providers. However, the enrollment process for each population category differs. For the formal sector, employees are enrolled upon the start of employment. It is mandatory that all employees enroll in health insurance. No exceptions are allowed for the size of the company. For the poor, the local government determines “poorness” and enrolls those who are determined poor. For the rest of the population there is open enrollment—one can walk into a local enrollment office anytime to enroll. While enrollment is mandatory only for the formal sector, for the remainder of the population, it is “construed” as voluntary although the law can be interpreted as being mandatory. There is an ongoing debate on the issue of mandated versus voluntary enrollment. Enrollment in PhilHealth is by family so the premium paid covers the member, the spouse, eligible children (those less than 21 years of age), and eligible parents (those 60 years and above and who depend financially on the member). Given that enrollment is by family, documentation of proof of marriage and birth(s) are required before spouses and children are enrolled. This is a problem for indigenous population as they usually do not have marriage and birth certificates. While the country has achieved significant strides in moving towards universal enrollment, covering the poor and informal sectors remains a challenge, with methods to enroll these populations through organized groups gaining very little traction. There is much ongoing discussion regarding the need for the central government to finance and/or subsidize the enrollment of the nation’s entire poor population. Leaving financial responsibility for insuring the poorest to local governments, coupled with a refusal to outright declare insurance as mandatory for all populations, makes it nearly impossible for the government to reach universal health coverage. It also forces PhilHealth to invest heavily in marketing campaigns for the program to local governments. PhilHealthPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 75 million PhilHealth coverage is theoretically available to the entire population. The enrollment process differs based on the population group. For example, all formal sector workers must enroll at the start of employment. The poor are identified and enrolled by the local government. The population is tagged to one of the four major population categorizations:
The benefits package is essentially the same for each population group. The exception is for indigents and the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) who have additional outpatient primary care benefits (with the providers paid by capitation) however these benefits are available only through public providers. However, the enrollment process for each population category differs. For the formal sector, employees are enrolled upon the start of employment. It is mandatory that all employees enroll in health insurance. No exceptions are allowed for the size of the company. For the poor, the local government determines “poorness” and enrolls those who are determined poor. For the rest of the population there is open enrollment—one can walk into a local enrollment office anytime to enroll. While enrollment is mandatory only for the formal sector, for the remainder of the population, it is “construed” as voluntary although the law can be interpreted as being mandatory. There is an ongoing debate on the issue of mandated versus voluntary enrollment. Enrollment in PhilHealth is by family so the premium paid covers the member, the spouse, eligible children (those less than 21 years of age), and eligible parents (those 60 years and above and who depend financially on the member). Given that enrollment is by family, documentation of proof of marriage and birth(s) are required before spouses and children are enrolled. This is a problem for indigenous population as they usually do not have marriage and birth certificates. While the country has achieved significant strides in moving towards universal enrollment, covering the poor and informal sectors remains a challenge, with methods to enroll these populations through organized groups gaining very little traction. There is much ongoing discussion regarding the need for the central government to finance and/or subsidize the enrollment of the nation’s entire poor population. Leaving financial responsibility for insuring the poorest to local governments, coupled with a refusal to outright declare insurance as mandatory for all populations, makes it nearly impossible for the government to reach universal health coverage. It also forces PhilHealth to invest heavily in marketing campaigns for the program to local governments. |
