Compare: Population covered

Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage

The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.


Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.


Program Target population Coverage Population covered
Kyrgyz Republic: Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF)
  • All populations
5.2 million

Kyrgyzstan offers free primary health care services to all citizens through the State Guaranteed Benefits Package (SGPB) regardless of insurance status. By 2003, 98% of the population was enrolled with a Family Group Practice (FGP) for their primary health care needs.

Read full section

Kyrgyzstan offers free primary health care services to all citizens through the State Guaranteed Benefits Package (SGPB) regardless of insurance status. By 2003, 98% of the population was enrolled with a Family Group Practice (FGP) for their primary health care needs. Enrollees choose a FGP of their choice and are free to move between FGPs once per year during the annual registration period.

Population groups covered by the MHIF include formal sector employees, civil servants, pensioners, the registered unemployed, children and students under age 21, welfare benefit recipients, farmers, and the self-employed. In 2001, over 80% of the population was covered by the MHIF.

Table 3: Coverage additions (1997-2001): Population groups, sources of financing and benefits

Population groupYearSource of financingServices provided (depth of coverage)
Formal sector employees, except civil servants19972% from the wage bill administered by the Social Fund (SF)Drugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
1998Emergency care at the primary level
2000Additional/outpatient drug package
Civil servants19982% from the wage bill administered by the SFDrugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
2000Additional/outpatient drug package
Pensioners1997Value of 1.5x minimum salary administered by the SF (Pension Fund)Drugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
1998Emergency care at primary level
2000Additional/outpatient drug package
2003Republican budgetCoverage unchanged
Registered unemployed1997Value of 1.5x minimum salary administered by SF (Unemployment Fund)Drugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
1998Republican budgetEmergency care at primary level
2000Additional/outpatient drug package
2002Effectively not covered: no funding provided this group by Republican budget
Children and students under 212000Value of 1.5x minimum salaryDrugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
Republican budgetEmergency care at the primary level
Additional/outpatient drug package
Welfare benefits recipients2000Value of 1.5 minimum salaryDrugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
Republican budgetEmergency care at the primary level
Additional/outpatient drug package
Farmers19972% of the land tax administered by SF (5% in 2000, 6% in 2003)Drugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
Emergency care at primary level
2002Health insurance policies (400 KGS = US $10/year) administered by MHIFCoverage unchanged
Self-employed19982% of the value of 3x minimum salaryDrugs at hospital level, salary bonuses
Emergency care at primary level
2000Additional/outpatient drug package
2002Health insurance policies (400 KGS = US$10/year) administered by the MHIFCoverage unchanged

Source: Jakab, M., and Manjieva, E.

Mexico: Seguro Popular
  • Below Poverty Line
  • Informal Sector
48 million

Enrollment in the SP takes place on a per-family basis. A family is composed of the father and/or mother, children and adopted children younger than eighteen or minors younger than eighteen who are dependents and live in the same household, those older than sixty-four years of age who live in the same household, single student children up to age twenty-five, and disabled children. Upon enrollment, families receive a pamphlet with their rights and duties that outlines the health interventions and services to which they are entitled.

Read full section

Enrollment in the SP takes place on a per-family basis. A family is composed of the father and/or mother, children and adopted children younger than eighteen or minors younger than eighteen who are dependents and live in the same household, those older than sixty-four years of age who live in the same household, single student children up to age twenty-five, and disabled children. Upon enrollment, families receive a pamphlet with their rights and duties that outlines the health interventions and services to which they are entitled. The SP was intended to be rolled out at the health center level. Regions were permitted to enroll individuals only if they had sufficient facilities and human resources to provide adequate care under the program. Enrollment took place at the municipal level, which meant that many municipalities without adequate facilities were not initially able to accommodate large-scale enrollment. State ministries of health are responsible for promotion of the SP program. Voluntary affiliation takes place on a quarterly basis, but enrollees must wait until the following trimester to begin receiving services. Due to the voluntary nature of the program, enrollees must choose to re-enroll annually.

At the start of the program, the primary strategies for enrollment focused on large-scale affiliation campaigns for vulnerable families. Strategies that have been used to aid in the enrollment and re-enrollment process have included the following: coordinating enrollment activities with other programs targeted to poor populations; promoting enrollment in public gathering places like markets and health clinics; communicating with state and local governments to help identify priority populations; collaborating with local governments to speed the processing of official documentation; re-enrollment invitations through mass-mailings to current enrollees; using mass-marketing campaigns to motivate re-enrollment; and launching special brigades for special enrollment campaigns in localities with low levels of enrollment or re-enrollment. However, due to the fact that there were annual quotas on the number of new enrollees, certain states limited the size of their communication campaigns.

During the first years of the SP targeted populations were given priority affiliation. These included those living in rural regions, those who belonged to poverty alleviating programs such as Oportunidades, and indigenous populations. As of 2009, special targeted populations included newborns and pregnant women. Moreover, the last few years have seen the growth of unemployment leading many families to lose their rights to public services such as IMSS or ISSSTE, which has led to an expansion of the enrollment goals for SP beyond what had previously been established.

During the two years of the pilot program between 2001 and 2003, 614,000 families were affiliated. By the end of 2006, this number had increased to 4 million families. In terms of percentages, in 2005 the SPSS covered approximately 14% of the previously uninsured population. By 2009, this number had reached in excess of 90% of the uninsured.

Table 1: Affiliation Coverage per State, 2009

StateFamilies Eligible to AffiliateAffiliated FamiliesPercent Coverage
Guerrero453,086356,84078.76
Sonora220,580186,38584.5
Baja California287,255246,87285.94
Puebla600,167533,98588.97
Durango136,791122,13389.28
Michoacán431,638385,90689.41
Zacatecas213,695196,83592.11
Oaxaca604,530562,69293.08
México1,145,9861,069,50999.33
Tamaulipas348,392335,759 96.37
Colima91,64488,59496.67
Chiapas697,769681,71197.7
Nayarit143,256140,16097.84
Nuevo Leon228,323223,68297.97
Morelos222,175218,28698.25
Sinaloa245,675243,38699.07
Hidalgo338,799335,72999.09
Distrito Federal420,901417,83499.27
Baja California Sur45,06042,54594.42
Quintana Roo109,337108,68399.4
Tlaxacala180,006179,14799.52
Guanajuato673,749676,987100.48
Chihuahua244,316246,155100.75
Yucatán200,2842,002,097100.91
Jalisco572,002577,856101.02
Campeche117,869119,281101.2
Querétaro159,642163,407102.36
Aguascalientes123,148126,070102.37
Veracruz700,126719,806102.81
Coahuila157,516161,955102.82
Tabasco433,397445,920102.89
San Luis Potosi271,271282,282104.06

Source: Secretaria de Salud

Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS)
  • All populations
143 million

Brazil’s health system is based on the notion of free, universal care. In 1998, 71.2% of the population reported that they had a regular-use service. In 2003, this number had increased to 80%. This is significant, since it means that individuals have a service which they use as an entry point into the health system. While 100 % of the population is able to receive services under the SUS, approximately 25% opt for private insurance coverage.

Read full section

Brazil’s health system is based on the notion of free, universal care. In 1998, 71.2% of the population reported that they had a regular-use service. In 2003, this number had increased to 80%. This is significant, since it means that individuals have a service which they use as an entry point into the health system. While 100 % of the population is able to receive services under the SUS, approximately 25% opt for private insurance coverage.

The Brazilian Supplementary Health System (SHS) served 33 million Brazilians in 2002, or 19% of the population. By 2007, it accounted for more than 50% of health care expenditure, yet it served less than 30% of the population. Health care operators within the SHS are grouped into categories by the Agency for Supplementary Health within the MOH, depending on their economic and financial status. Ordered by market share in 2002, these categories are group medicine, medical cooperatives, health insurance, charity, self-management, group dentistry, and dentistry cooperatives. Most of these plans are connected to employment. The majority of these plans tend to be small or medium in size and operate mostly through contractual arrangements with doctors’ offices and hospitals. In 2002, group medicine, medical cooperatives and health insurance served around 80% of supplementary users and accounted for 90% of billing. Initially, private prepayment plans had an incentive not to provide comprehensive coverage to enrollees, as high-cost procedures were usually funneled to the SUS for treatment. However, in 1999, the government instituted a norm that allows it to recover the costs associated with services rendered by the SUS to beneficiaries of private health plans. This norm is implemented through the National Supplementary Health Council (CNSS).