Compare: Population covered

Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage

The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.


Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.


Program Target population Coverage Population covered
Rwanda: Mutuelles de Sante
  • Below Poverty Line
  • Informal Sector
7.9 million

Enrollment in the Mutuelle system is voluntary and is primarily coordinated at the district and sector level. Each community-based Mutuelle is responsible for increasing enrollment, maintaining re-enrollment, educating the population about the program, verifying the number of participants in each household, and collecting membership contributions. Outreach is done most frequently at the community level via church services, radio broadcasts, etc, and tends to focus largely on the rural and informal sector in order to most effectively target those individuals unable to access formal health insurance through other means.

Read full section

Enrollment in the Mutuelle system is voluntary and is primarily coordinated at the district and sector level. Each community-based Mutuelle is responsible for increasing enrollment, maintaining re-enrollment, educating the population about the program, verifying the number of participants in each household, and collecting membership contributions. Outreach is done most frequently at the community level via church services, radio broadcasts, etc, and tends to focus largely on the rural and informal sector in order to most effectively target those individuals unable to access formal health insurance through other means.

Enrollment for Rwanda Health Insurance Scheme (La Rwandaise d’Assurance Maladie or RAMA) and Military Medical Insurance (MMI) are coordinated through the government and employers. Initially only civil servants and their families were covered with RAMA, however, in 2003 coverage expanded to all those employed in both the public and the private sector. In 2006 RAMA only covered approximately 2.2% of the population. Coverage through MMI is provided for all members of the Rwandan Defense Force. Family members of MMI affiliates are covered under the same conditions as in RAMA. The exact number of beneficiaries is difficult to calculate due to national security issues but an estimated figure of 100,000 individuals or approximately 1.1% of the total Rwandan population is estimated to be covered. Combined, these programs insure less than 5% of the population.

The result of these health insurance programs has been an incredible upsurge in health insurance enrollment. USAID estimates that in 2010 approximately 92% of the population had health coverage, up from about 10% in 1999 since the implementation of the Community-Based Health Initiatives (CBHI). Geographically, enrollment has expanded from about 4 provinces to all 11 provinces. After national expansion of CBHI, participation increased coverage to 5.8 million persons, about 70% of the population. The Ministry of Health has stated that the rapid uptake seen in the early years of the program undoubtedly speaks to the communal and grassroots dynamics of the country.

Enrollment uptake in Health Insurance System from 2002 to 2006

Chile: National Health Fund (FONASA)
  • All populations
11 million

Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA.

Read full section

Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA.

FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories.

In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations.

Table 1: Individuals covered per category

InsurerIndividuals coveredPopulation covered (%)
FONASA11,329,48169.65
Open ISAPREs2,521,44415.50
Closed ISAPREs138,8940.85
Uninsured1,701,64810.46
Others575,7713.54
Total population16,267,278100.00

Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106

Mexico: Seguro Popular
  • Below Poverty Line
  • Informal Sector
48 million

Enrollment in the SP takes place on a per-family basis. A family is composed of the father and/or mother, children and adopted children younger than eighteen or minors younger than eighteen who are dependents and live in the same household, those older than sixty-four years of age who live in the same household, single student children up to age twenty-five, and disabled children. Upon enrollment, families receive a pamphlet with their rights and duties that outlines the health interventions and services to which they are entitled.

Read full section

Enrollment in the SP takes place on a per-family basis. A family is composed of the father and/or mother, children and adopted children younger than eighteen or minors younger than eighteen who are dependents and live in the same household, those older than sixty-four years of age who live in the same household, single student children up to age twenty-five, and disabled children. Upon enrollment, families receive a pamphlet with their rights and duties that outlines the health interventions and services to which they are entitled. The SP was intended to be rolled out at the health center level. Regions were permitted to enroll individuals only if they had sufficient facilities and human resources to provide adequate care under the program. Enrollment took place at the municipal level, which meant that many municipalities without adequate facilities were not initially able to accommodate large-scale enrollment. State ministries of health are responsible for promotion of the SP program. Voluntary affiliation takes place on a quarterly basis, but enrollees must wait until the following trimester to begin receiving services. Due to the voluntary nature of the program, enrollees must choose to re-enroll annually.

At the start of the program, the primary strategies for enrollment focused on large-scale affiliation campaigns for vulnerable families. Strategies that have been used to aid in the enrollment and re-enrollment process have included the following: coordinating enrollment activities with other programs targeted to poor populations; promoting enrollment in public gathering places like markets and health clinics; communicating with state and local governments to help identify priority populations; collaborating with local governments to speed the processing of official documentation; re-enrollment invitations through mass-mailings to current enrollees; using mass-marketing campaigns to motivate re-enrollment; and launching special brigades for special enrollment campaigns in localities with low levels of enrollment or re-enrollment. However, due to the fact that there were annual quotas on the number of new enrollees, certain states limited the size of their communication campaigns.

During the first years of the SP targeted populations were given priority affiliation. These included those living in rural regions, those who belonged to poverty alleviating programs such as Oportunidades, and indigenous populations. As of 2009, special targeted populations included newborns and pregnant women. Moreover, the last few years have seen the growth of unemployment leading many families to lose their rights to public services such as IMSS or ISSSTE, which has led to an expansion of the enrollment goals for SP beyond what had previously been established.

During the two years of the pilot program between 2001 and 2003, 614,000 families were affiliated. By the end of 2006, this number had increased to 4 million families. In terms of percentages, in 2005 the SPSS covered approximately 14% of the previously uninsured population. By 2009, this number had reached in excess of 90% of the uninsured.

Table 1: Affiliation Coverage per State, 2009

StateFamilies Eligible to AffiliateAffiliated FamiliesPercent Coverage
Guerrero453,086356,84078.76
Sonora220,580186,38584.5
Baja California287,255246,87285.94
Puebla600,167533,98588.97
Durango136,791122,13389.28
Michoacán431,638385,90689.41
Zacatecas213,695196,83592.11
Oaxaca604,530562,69293.08
México1,145,9861,069,50999.33
Tamaulipas348,392335,759 96.37
Colima91,64488,59496.67
Chiapas697,769681,71197.7
Nayarit143,256140,16097.84
Nuevo Leon228,323223,68297.97
Morelos222,175218,28698.25
Sinaloa245,675243,38699.07
Hidalgo338,799335,72999.09
Distrito Federal420,901417,83499.27
Baja California Sur45,06042,54594.42
Quintana Roo109,337108,68399.4
Tlaxacala180,006179,14799.52
Guanajuato673,749676,987100.48
Chihuahua244,316246,155100.75
Yucatán200,2842,002,097100.91
Jalisco572,002577,856101.02
Campeche117,869119,281101.2
Querétaro159,642163,407102.36
Aguascalientes123,148126,070102.37
Veracruz700,126719,806102.81
Coahuila157,516161,955102.82
Tabasco433,397445,920102.89
San Luis Potosi271,271282,282104.06

Source: Secretaria de Salud