The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Target population | Coverage | Population covered | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vietnam: Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance Schemes |
|
36.5 million |
It is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. Read full sectionIt is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. When the SHI program initially began, only large employers were required to enroll their workers in the scheme. However, in 2005 the government expanded the mandate to companies of all sizes. Of Vietnam’s 7.7 million formal sector workers, 4.8 million (63%) are in the contributory scheme, but 2 million formal sector workers (26%) remain without coverage. Furthermore, SHI enrollment appears to be higher among the “better-off,” while middle-income groups currently have the lowest enrollment rates. Under the VHI, until the end of 2009, full-time students were typically enrolled en masse by insurance agents operating at schools and colleges. As of January 2010, full-time students are automatically enrolled as a part of the CHI. Family members/dependents of the compulsorily insured can enroll in the VSS scheme of their own accord. Others can enroll through group organizations, including communes. Prior to 2007, dependents were required to enroll all household members together and group organizations required a 20% minimum rate of participation. However, these stipulations have since been eliminated. Nonetheless, voluntary enrollment among the non-student population has stayed low with no signs of improvement. Enrollment in HCFP is a bit more complex. Provinces are tasked with identifying beneficiaries under the target groups. Identification has not been a challenge for at least two of the target groups, as communes and ethnic minority households are well documented. In the case of poor households, who have proved to be the most difficult group to identify, local governments begin by building upon lists of officially poor households produced for other government programs. Then commune officials conduct further household surveys to produce a proposed list of HCFP beneficiaries, which is then discussed and voted upon at a public meeting presided over by the village or commune leader. Officials from the district government’s labor and social affairs offices (MOLISA) then review the list, which can be revised before it is sent to the provincial department of labor and social affairs for final approval. Until recently, provinces were free to decide whether to enroll HCFP beneficiaries in the government’s SHI program, or to manage the risk themselves and provide direct reimbursement to providers. However, this latter option, which was initially the most popular with provinces, has since been phased out through a 2005 government directive updating Decision 139. According new Health Insurance Law, effective since July, 2009, the poor are included in the compulsory health insurance program. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by compulsory health insurance. Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance SchemesPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 36.5 million It is the responsibility of the provinces to identify beneficiaries for the HCFP. While ethnic minorities and communes are fairly easy to identify because they are well documented, developing a list of the poor is more challenging. Local governments use already existing lists produced for other government programs in addition to household surveys. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by the compulsory health insurance. When the SHI program initially began, only large employers were required to enroll their workers in the scheme. However, in 2005 the government expanded the mandate to companies of all sizes. Of Vietnam’s 7.7 million formal sector workers, 4.8 million (63%) are in the contributory scheme, but 2 million formal sector workers (26%) remain without coverage. Furthermore, SHI enrollment appears to be higher among the “better-off,” while middle-income groups currently have the lowest enrollment rates. Under the VHI, until the end of 2009, full-time students were typically enrolled en masse by insurance agents operating at schools and colleges. As of January 2010, full-time students are automatically enrolled as a part of the CHI. Family members/dependents of the compulsorily insured can enroll in the VSS scheme of their own accord. Others can enroll through group organizations, including communes. Prior to 2007, dependents were required to enroll all household members together and group organizations required a 20% minimum rate of participation. However, these stipulations have since been eliminated. Nonetheless, voluntary enrollment among the non-student population has stayed low with no signs of improvement. Enrollment in HCFP is a bit more complex. Provinces are tasked with identifying beneficiaries under the target groups. Identification has not been a challenge for at least two of the target groups, as communes and ethnic minority households are well documented. In the case of poor households, who have proved to be the most difficult group to identify, local governments begin by building upon lists of officially poor households produced for other government programs. Then commune officials conduct further household surveys to produce a proposed list of HCFP beneficiaries, which is then discussed and voted upon at a public meeting presided over by the village or commune leader. Officials from the district government’s labor and social affairs offices (MOLISA) then review the list, which can be revised before it is sent to the provincial department of labor and social affairs for final approval. Until recently, provinces were free to decide whether to enroll HCFP beneficiaries in the government’s SHI program, or to manage the risk themselves and provide direct reimbursement to providers. However, this latter option, which was initially the most popular with provinces, has since been phased out through a 2005 government directive updating Decision 139. According new Health Insurance Law, effective since July, 2009, the poor are included in the compulsory health insurance program. About 15 million additional persons, classified as poor, are now covered by compulsory health insurance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
40,835,265 |
In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Read full sectionIn both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. General System of Social Security in HealthPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 40,835,265 In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mali: Mutuelles |
|
400,000 |
The Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. Read full sectionThe Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. The main challenge in promoting the Mutuelle movement for large-scale enrollment thus continues to be implementing a major information and awareness campaign for Mutuelles at the national scale. This is part of the national strategy and advocacy activities that also include local and national leaders . Since the AMO is mandatory, beneficiaries are enrolled automatically by withdrawing dues from their wages. Benefit eligibility begins on May 1, 2011 for those who have paid dues for six months. With regard to identifying the indigent for RAMED, the social services in each commune routinely conduct a social survey to assess the situation after interested parties submit an application. The social services or other persons may also prepare an application on behalf of someone else who has not taken the initiative to do so for several reasons. Based on the social survey, the communal authorities issue an indigent card that serves as physical evidence to enroll the member and to obtain the card from the National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM – the management agency for RAMED) and to obtain care (including the beneficiaries whose applications are submitted to ANAM staff). The status of indigence is always considered temporary, so that the insured member’s card is annual. MutuellesPopulation covered Target Populations: Informal Sector
Coverage Level: 400,000 The Mutuelle system is still voluntary, and thus steps must be taken to bring about large-scale enrollment of the people. Thus, the “national strategy to extend health coverage through Mutuelles” contains solutions for the slow pace at which Mutuelles grew in the past, for the poor capacities of the players involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement, the management of Mutuelle movement organizations, and the lack of information and awareness about the Mutuelle movement on the national level. It was found that the principal actors were not enlisted sufficiently at the local level in the past. Health care workers, the ASACOs, and the territorial governments were only marginally involved in promoting the Mutuelle movement. By organizing Mutuelles at the commune level, the strategy seeks to have the mayors and local elected officials play an active role in mobilizing the population. The main challenge in promoting the Mutuelle movement for large-scale enrollment thus continues to be implementing a major information and awareness campaign for Mutuelles at the national scale. This is part of the national strategy and advocacy activities that also include local and national leaders . Since the AMO is mandatory, beneficiaries are enrolled automatically by withdrawing dues from their wages. Benefit eligibility begins on May 1, 2011 for those who have paid dues for six months. With regard to identifying the indigent for RAMED, the social services in each commune routinely conduct a social survey to assess the situation after interested parties submit an application. The social services or other persons may also prepare an application on behalf of someone else who has not taken the initiative to do so for several reasons. Based on the social survey, the communal authorities issue an indigent card that serves as physical evidence to enroll the member and to obtain the card from the National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM – the management agency for RAMED) and to obtain care (including the beneficiaries whose applications are submitted to ANAM staff). The status of indigence is always considered temporary, so that the insured member’s card is annual. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile: National Health Fund (FONASA) |
|
11 million |
Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. Read full sectionEnrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 National Health Fund (FONASA)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 11 million Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya: National Hospital Insurance Fund |
|
2.7 million |
To be a member of the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF), one must simply be a Kenyan resident age 18 or older. NHIF covers certain dependents of the primary policy holder automatically, including spouses, children under the age of 18, students (even if over the age of 18), and disabled dependents. Other adult family members require separate premium contributions to be covered. NHIF is responsible for enrolling and registering all eligible members from the formal and informal sectors. Read full sectionTo be a member of the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF), one must simply be a Kenyan resident age 18 or older. NHIF covers certain dependents of the primary policy holder automatically, including spouses, children under the age of 18, students (even if over the age of 18), and disabled dependents. Other adult family members require separate premium contributions to be covered. NHIF is responsible for enrolling and registering all eligible members from the formal and informal sectors. Total membership in NHIF rose from about 206,000 in 1998 to 1,372,000 in 2006. By 2011 about 2.7 million people were insured by NHIF, 2.1 million of which are employed in the formal sector. Approximately 88% of the people with insurance in Kenya are insured by the NHIF. However, currently only about 25% of the poor have medical coverage. Recently, NHIF has embarked on a program to work with community-based organizations to expand informal sector membership. National Hospital Insurance FundPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 2.7 million To be a member of the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF), one must simply be a Kenyan resident age 18 or older. NHIF covers certain dependents of the primary policy holder automatically, including spouses, children under the age of 18, students (even if over the age of 18), and disabled dependents. Other adult family members require separate premium contributions to be covered. NHIF is responsible for enrolling and registering all eligible members from the formal and informal sectors. Total membership in NHIF rose from about 206,000 in 1998 to 1,372,000 in 2006. By 2011 about 2.7 million people were insured by NHIF, 2.1 million of which are employed in the formal sector. Approximately 88% of the people with insurance in Kenya are insured by the NHIF. However, currently only about 25% of the poor have medical coverage. Recently, NHIF has embarked on a program to work with community-based organizations to expand informal sector membership. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| India: Rajiv Aarogyasri |
|
65 million people |
Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The scheme has been implemented in all districts in the state. Upon enrollment, beneficiary households receive a Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Card, a mechanism through which patients are identified and medical records are kept. Read full sectionAarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The scheme has been implemented in all districts in the state. Upon enrollment, beneficiary households receive a Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Card, a mechanism through which patients are identified and medical records are kept. Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The state already had a mechanism for defining, identifying, and enrolling below-the-poverty-line families. Each eligible family is issued a “White Card” (a ration card) to identify them as below-the-poverty line. Aarogyasri uses the “White Card” as a targeting mechanism for its scheme. Families in the state who already have “White Cards” are provided with Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Cards. Everyone in a household can be included in the Rajiv Aarogyasri Health Card. This means the head of the family, spouse, dependent children, and dependent parents. The Health Card captures the family’s data and pictures of each family member. It is presented by beneficiaries when they arrive at a health facility to identify them. The card is also used to store patient visit records and transmit utilization information. Once enrolled, beneficiaries are guided through the process of seeking care. In order to ensure that beneficiaries know what benefits they are entitled to, and are able to navigate the system of care, Aarogyasri has developed a team of 4,000 Aarogya Mithras. Aarogya Mithras are health workers representing the community of the insured. One Aarogya Mithra sits in each primary health center across the state. These health centers are most often the first points of contact for most families seeking care. In addition, district hospitals and network hospitals also have help desks manned by Aarogya Mithras to facilitate smooth service delivery for Aarogyasri beneficiaries. Aarogya Mithras help to guide beneficiaries through the network of care and inform them about their insurance benefits. In addition to contacts with Aarogya Mithras, beneficiaries can visit health screening camps that are set up by network providers in rural areas. Under the scheme, all network hospitals are required to undertake a specified number of village health camps in order to maintain their network status. Beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries attend the health camps to be screened for diseases and are provided with preventive care. Those that can be treated at the camp are treated; those that require further treatment are referred to network hospitals where their ailment will be treated free of cost under their Aarogyasri benefits. As of November 2009, there have been more than 15,000 camps and nearly 2.5 million people have been screened. Rajiv AarogyasriPopulation covered Target Populations: Below Poverty Line
Coverage Level: 65 million people Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The scheme has been implemented in all districts in the state. Upon enrollment, beneficiary households receive a Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Card, a mechanism through which patients are identified and medical records are kept. Aarogyasri covers all below-the-poverty-line residents of Andrah Pradesh. The state already had a mechanism for defining, identifying, and enrolling below-the-poverty-line families. Each eligible family is issued a “White Card” (a ration card) to identify them as below-the-poverty line. Aarogyasri uses the “White Card” as a targeting mechanism for its scheme. Families in the state who already have “White Cards” are provided with Rajiv Aarogyasri Bhima Health Cards. Everyone in a household can be included in the Rajiv Aarogyasri Health Card. This means the head of the family, spouse, dependent children, and dependent parents. The Health Card captures the family’s data and pictures of each family member. It is presented by beneficiaries when they arrive at a health facility to identify them. The card is also used to store patient visit records and transmit utilization information. Once enrolled, beneficiaries are guided through the process of seeking care. In order to ensure that beneficiaries know what benefits they are entitled to, and are able to navigate the system of care, Aarogyasri has developed a team of 4,000 Aarogya Mithras. Aarogya Mithras are health workers representing the community of the insured. One Aarogya Mithra sits in each primary health center across the state. These health centers are most often the first points of contact for most families seeking care. In addition, district hospitals and network hospitals also have help desks manned by Aarogya Mithras to facilitate smooth service delivery for Aarogyasri beneficiaries. Aarogya Mithras help to guide beneficiaries through the network of care and inform them about their insurance benefits. In addition to contacts with Aarogya Mithras, beneficiaries can visit health screening camps that are set up by network providers in rural areas. Under the scheme, all network hospitals are required to undertake a specified number of village health camps in order to maintain their network status. Beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries attend the health camps to be screened for diseases and are provided with preventive care. Those that can be treated at the camp are treated; those that require further treatment are referred to network hospitals where their ailment will be treated free of cost under their Aarogyasri benefits. As of November 2009, there have been more than 15,000 camps and nearly 2.5 million people have been screened. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| India: RSBY |
|
40 million |
RSBY aims to cover all below-the-poverty-line residents of participating Indian states. An electronic list of eligible BPL households is provided to the insurers by each state’s Ministry of Labor and Employment (MoLE). Enrolled members receive Smart Cards, which acts as the enrollment, identification, and record-keeping mechanism for the scheme. Read full sectionRSBY aims to cover all below-the-poverty-line residents of participating Indian states. An electronic list of eligible BPL households is provided to the insurers by each state’s Ministry of Labor and Employment (MoLE). Enrolled members receive Smart Cards, which acts as the enrollment, identification, and record-keeping mechanism for the scheme. RSBY aims to cover all below-the-poverty-line residents of participating Indian states. An enrollment schedule for each village, along with dates, is prepared by the insurance company with the help of district officials. The insurance companies are provided a maximum of four months to enroll BPL families in each district. To communicate and market the RSBY scheme and enrollment camps, insurance companies are required to hire intermediaries to provide grassroots outreach prior to enrollment. (These organizations could also be used to provide assistance to members in utilizing services after enrollment.) In addition, the BPL list is posted in each village at the enrollment station and prominent places prior to the enrollment camp. The date/location of the enrollment camp are also publicized in advance. Mobile enrollment stations are established at local centers (e.g., public schools) at each village at least once a year. These stations are equipped by the insurer with a printer to print SmartCards, as well as hardware to collect biometric information (fingerprints) and photographs of household members to be covered. A SmartCard is given to each BPL family at the time of enrollment in the scheme. Fingerprints of all beneficiaries are collected during enrollment at the village level. One thumb impression of each of the household beneficiaries is stored in the SmartCard. This fingerprint is used to verify the identity of the beneficiaries at the hospital. The SmartCard is prepared and printed on-the-spot in the village by the insurer and handed over to the beneficiary. This SmartCard can be used by the beneficiary in any empanelled hospital across India to obtain treatment. The SmartCard given to each enrolled household also contains a new national unique ID for each family—a program the Government of India is implementing nationwide. The SmartCard, along with an information packet describing benefits, hospitals in network, and other relevant information is provided to all enrollees once they have paid the Rs. 30/- registration fee. The process normally takes less than 10 minutes. Another unique feature of the scheme is its key management system which helps in reducing enrollment fraud and improves accountability. A government official from the district (field key officer—FKO) needs to be present at the camp and must insert his/her own government-issued SmartCard and provide his/her fingerprint to verify the legitimacy of the enrollment. This way each enrollee can be tracked to a particular government official. The details of each BPL family who is authenticated by the FKO gets transferred to the FKO’s SmartCard; the data is also transferred from the FKO’s card to the government server at the district level. In addition to the FKO, an insurance company/SmartCard agency rep is present at the enrollment camp. At the end of the enrollment camp, a list of enrolled households is sent to the state nodal agency by the Insurer. The list of enrolled households is maintained centrally and the insurer is paid once data provided from the insurer and FKO card has been reconciled. The aim of the scheme is to use technology not only for controlling fraud and monitoring utilization, but also to find innovative solutions to insurance-related problems. For example, enrollment software has been designed to ensure that male heads of households must insure their spouses. In addition, since the scheme aims to provide quality treatment to all beneficiaries, technology has been implemented to ensure that every beneficiary receives needed treatment. For example, if a patient is not in a condition to validate his/her identity at the hospital then any family member who is on the SmartCard can validate the identity of the patient by providing his/her fingerprint. Currently, the Government of India is considering how the SmartCard can be used for other social sector schemes and how the RSBY technology platform can be used to provide other services to the below-the-poverty-line population. RSBYPopulation covered Target Populations: Below Poverty Line
Coverage Level: 40 million RSBY aims to cover all below-the-poverty-line residents of participating Indian states. An electronic list of eligible BPL households is provided to the insurers by each state’s Ministry of Labor and Employment (MoLE). Enrolled members receive Smart Cards, which acts as the enrollment, identification, and record-keeping mechanism for the scheme. RSBY aims to cover all below-the-poverty-line residents of participating Indian states. An enrollment schedule for each village, along with dates, is prepared by the insurance company with the help of district officials. The insurance companies are provided a maximum of four months to enroll BPL families in each district. To communicate and market the RSBY scheme and enrollment camps, insurance companies are required to hire intermediaries to provide grassroots outreach prior to enrollment. (These organizations could also be used to provide assistance to members in utilizing services after enrollment.) In addition, the BPL list is posted in each village at the enrollment station and prominent places prior to the enrollment camp. The date/location of the enrollment camp are also publicized in advance. Mobile enrollment stations are established at local centers (e.g., public schools) at each village at least once a year. These stations are equipped by the insurer with a printer to print SmartCards, as well as hardware to collect biometric information (fingerprints) and photographs of household members to be covered. A SmartCard is given to each BPL family at the time of enrollment in the scheme. Fingerprints of all beneficiaries are collected during enrollment at the village level. One thumb impression of each of the household beneficiaries is stored in the SmartCard. This fingerprint is used to verify the identity of the beneficiaries at the hospital. The SmartCard is prepared and printed on-the-spot in the village by the insurer and handed over to the beneficiary. This SmartCard can be used by the beneficiary in any empanelled hospital across India to obtain treatment. The SmartCard given to each enrolled household also contains a new national unique ID for each family—a program the Government of India is implementing nationwide. The SmartCard, along with an information packet describing benefits, hospitals in network, and other relevant information is provided to all enrollees once they have paid the Rs. 30/- registration fee. The process normally takes less than 10 minutes. Another unique feature of the scheme is its key management system which helps in reducing enrollment fraud and improves accountability. A government official from the district (field key officer—FKO) needs to be present at the camp and must insert his/her own government-issued SmartCard and provide his/her fingerprint to verify the legitimacy of the enrollment. This way each enrollee can be tracked to a particular government official. The details of each BPL family who is authenticated by the FKO gets transferred to the FKO’s SmartCard; the data is also transferred from the FKO’s card to the government server at the district level. In addition to the FKO, an insurance company/SmartCard agency rep is present at the enrollment camp. At the end of the enrollment camp, a list of enrolled households is sent to the state nodal agency by the Insurer. The list of enrolled households is maintained centrally and the insurer is paid once data provided from the insurer and FKO card has been reconciled. The aim of the scheme is to use technology not only for controlling fraud and monitoring utilization, but also to find innovative solutions to insurance-related problems. For example, enrollment software has been designed to ensure that male heads of households must insure their spouses. In addition, since the scheme aims to provide quality treatment to all beneficiaries, technology has been implemented to ensure that every beneficiary receives needed treatment. For example, if a patient is not in a condition to validate his/her identity at the hospital then any family member who is on the SmartCard can validate the identity of the patient by providing his/her fingerprint. Currently, the Government of India is considering how the SmartCard can be used for other social sector schemes and how the RSBY technology platform can be used to provide other services to the below-the-poverty-line population. |