UHC Forward: Towards Universal Health Coverage

Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA.

FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories.

In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations.

Table 1: Individuals covered per category

Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106

PhilHealth coverage is theoretically available to the entire population. The enrollment process differs based on the population group. For example, all formal sector workers must enroll at the start of employment. The poor are identified and enrolled by the local government.

The population is tagged to one of the four major population categorizations:

• Formal sector
• Indigents that are financed by central and local governments
• Retirees (non-paying members) who have already paid 120 months of membership
• The individual paying program (IPP) for those not eligible for the other three categories

The benefits package is essentially the same for each population group. The exception is for indigents and the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) who have additional outpatient primary care benefits (with the providers paid by capitation) however these benefits are available only through public providers.

However, the enrollment process for each population category differs. For the formal sector, employees are enrolled upon the start of employment. It is mandatory that all employees enroll in health insurance. No exceptions are allowed for the size of the company. For the poor, the local government determines “poorness” and enrolls those who are determined poor. For the rest of the population there is open enrollment—one can walk into a local enrollment office anytime to enroll.

While enrollment is mandatory only for the formal sector, for the remainder of the population, it is “construed” as voluntary although the law can be interpreted as being mandatory. There is an ongoing debate on the issue of mandated versus voluntary enrollment.

Enrollment in PhilHealth is by family so the premium paid covers the member, the spouse, eligible children (those less than 21 years of age), and eligible parents (those 60 years and above and who depend financially on the member). Given that enrollment is by family, documentation of proof of marriage and birth(s) are required before spouses and children are enrolled. This is a problem for indigenous population as they usually do not have marriage and birth certificates.

While the country has achieved significant strides in moving towards universal enrollment, covering the poor and informal sectors remains a challenge, with methods to enroll these populations through organized groups gaining very little traction. There is much ongoing discussion regarding the need for the central government to finance and/or subsidize the enrollment of the nation’s entire poor population. Leaving financial responsibility for insuring the poorest to local governments, coupled with a refusal to outright declare insurance as mandatory for all populations, makes it nearly impossible for the government to reach universal health coverage. It also forces PhilHealth to invest heavily in marketing campaigns for the program to local governments.

Enrollment in the SP takes place on a per-family basis. A family is composed of the father and/or mother, children and adopted children younger than eighteen or minors younger than eighteen who are dependents and live in the same household, those older than sixty-four years of age who live in the same household, single student children up to age twenty-five, and disabled children. Upon enrollment, families receive a pamphlet with their rights and duties that outlines the health interventions and services to which they are entitled. The SP was intended to be rolled out at the health center level. Regions were permitted to enroll individuals only if they had sufficient facilities and human resources to provide adequate care under the program. Enrollment took place at the municipal level, which meant that many municipalities without adequate facilities were not initially able to accommodate large-scale enrollment. State ministries of health are responsible for promotion of the SP program. Voluntary affiliation takes place on a quarterly basis, but enrollees must wait until the following trimester to begin receiving services. Due to the voluntary nature of the program, enrollees must choose to re-enroll annually.

At the start of the program, the primary strategies for enrollment focused on large-scale affiliation campaigns for vulnerable families. Strategies that have been used to aid in the enrollment and re-enrollment process have included the following: coordinating enrollment activities with other programs targeted to poor populations; promoting enrollment in public gathering places like markets and health clinics; communicating with state and local governments to help identify priority populations; collaborating with local governments to speed the processing of official documentation; re-enrollment invitations through mass-mailings to current enrollees; using mass-marketing campaigns to motivate re-enrollment; and launching special brigades for special enrollment campaigns in localities with low levels of enrollment or re-enrollment. However, due to the fact that there were annual quotas on the number of new enrollees, certain states limited the size of their communication campaigns.

During the first years of the SP targeted populations were given priority affiliation. These included those living in rural regions, those who belonged to poverty alleviating programs such as Oportunidades, and indigenous populations. As of 2009, special targeted populations included newborns and pregnant women. Moreover, the last few years have seen the growth of unemployment leading many families to lose their rights to public services such as IMSS or ISSSTE, which has led to an expansion of the enrollment goals for SP beyond what had previously been established.

During the two years of the pilot program between 2001 and 2003, 614,000 families were affiliated. By the end of 2006, this number had increased to 4 million families. In terms of percentages, in 2005 the SPSS covered approximately 14% of the previously uninsured population. By 2009, this number had reached in excess of 90% of the uninsured.

Table 1: Affiliation Coverage per State, 2009

Source: Secretaria de Salud