The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Target population | Coverage | Population covered | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
40,835,265 |
In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Read full sectionIn both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. General System of Social Security in HealthPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 40,835,265 In both the CR and the SR individuals choose their insurer as well as the provider within the insurer’s network. Enrollment mechanisms between the two systems, however, are quite distinct. While anyone is free to enroll in the CR, it is mandatory for formal sector workers and self-employed workers who earn one minimum salary per month. The CR enrolled 13,335,932 persons in 2001 and 17,234,265 persons in 2008. Between 1993, when the reform was passed, and 2002, there arose the need to implement monitoring and supervision mechanisms to enforce the enrollment of self-employed workers in the CR. This has largely been achieved through two distinct methods. First, law 797 of 2003 linked pension and health insurance contributions. This affected enrollee evasion, as individuals wishing to have a pension must also have health insurance. It also affected contribution evasion, since the income level used to calculate pension contributions is also used to calculate CR contributions. Second, decree 1703 of 2002 instituted sanctions on employers if they did not ensure that self-employed workers (e.g. consultants) participated in the CR. Finally, between 2006and 2007 the Integrated Payroll Contributions Settlement system was instituted, obliging all companies and the self-employed to settle their social security payments through electronic fund transfers. While the expansion of the SR was taking place, a unique and innovative enrollment qualification criteria was used designed to give priority to targeted groups based on income level and degree of vulnerability/likely need for care, while taking into consideration the available funds. Priority was given to special populations such as orphans and the elderly, regardless of SISBEN score, which is the proxy-means test used to identify the most vulnerable members of a community. Preference was then assigned to the poor who were either pregnant, under the age of 5, displaced by violence, or disabled. The rest of the population was ordered by SISBEN score, with a score of 1 representing the most destitute and a score of 5 representing the least destitute. Once the ranked list was published, individuals signed up with an EPSS of their choice. If an individual did not sign up, he or she had to wait until the next round of affiliations to do so. Enrollment of those who were eligible was ongoing as additional funds become available. Also, after all level 1 and 2 individuals were covered, municipalities that had resources left over could begin to cover level 3 individuals. This process was slightly altered by Accord number 415 of 2009, which states that the non-affiliated, eligible population can sign up with the SR at any point during the year. In 2002 the SR enrolled 11,444,003 persons. By 2009, this number had risen to 23,804,788. An important issue is the monitoring of fraud within the SR. Starting in 2000, the government began monitoring and updating the subsidized scheme databases. This led to the expulsion of many fraudulent enrollees. By 2005, a complete database of SR enrollees had been set up and included their names, identification numbers, and the name of their EPSS. This database was completed in 2009. Beginning in 2004, there was an expansion of partial subsidies to SISBEN level 3 individuals. The UPC for this plan equals approximately 42% of the CR UPC. While this plan expands coverage to those who remain uninsured, it offers a smaller benefits package. As of March 2009 there are 1,115,789 individuals covered by partial subsidies. Lack of automatic mobility between the SR and CR upon a change in labor standing among the poor is thought to be a disincentive for Colombians to move into formal employment. The fear existed primarily among subsidized regime enrollees who would not be able to easily rejoin the SR if they lost their formal sector employment. To deal with this concern, in 2005 the government stated that a person can be reinstated into the SR within the year in case of subsequent eligibility changes. Furthermore, at the end of the year the process of re-enrolling in the SR will be quicker and easier. This change should lead to expansions in the formal workforce and higher levels of CR enrollment as more people are willing to leave the SR. Population coverage has increased significantly since the 1993 reform, with a substantial part of the growth taking place after 2002. In 1990, 15.7% of the population had health insurance coverage. By 2008 the percentage of those covered had risen to 89.36%. This is a 570% increase in coverage over an 18 year span. The populations that were most affected by the reform were the bottom 2 income quintiles. Figure II shows that coverage for quintile 1 increased by 540% while quintile 2 increased by 250% between 1992 and 2003. Figure 2 also shows that there was a drop in coverage between 1997 and 2000, with an eventual recovery in 2003. This effect was primarily caused by a severe macroeconomic recession between 1998 and 2000. The recession not only reduced formal employment, affecting enrollment in the CR as well as the solidarity contribution to the SR, but it also reduced general tax transfers to the SR. With the recession ended and renewed political support for health coverage, the growth trend continued its upward movement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia: Jamkesmas |
|
76.4 million |
Though the scheme has never been formally marketed, Jamkesmas has enrolled more beneficiaries than any other Indonesian health insurance plan. Its target population is defined using an annually administered national survey known as the SUSENAS according to daily household consumption estimates. Read full sectionThough the scheme has never been formally marketed, Jamkesmas has enrolled more beneficiaries than any other Indonesian health insurance plan. Its target population is defined using an annually administered national survey known as the SUSENAS according to daily household consumption estimates. SUSENAS is a social and economic household survey used to define total household consumption for GDP estimation purposes. Based on standard definitions of the poor in terms of daily household consumption, the total number of poor has been defined. The sub-national distribution of this total has also been defined in a similar manner. P.T. Askes remains the administrator of membership in the Jamkesmas program since it has operated the program since 2005. P.T. Askes has a contract with the MoH to administer the membership part of the program separate from other programs. P.T. Askes obtains a list of the number of persons eligible each year from the Central Bureau of Statistics which is a part of Bappenas (the national planning agency). P.T. Askes then distributes the cards and registers enrollees into the program. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) is responsible for the development of a national identity card to be distributed throughout the entire population. When this card has been distributed, it will become the basis for enrollment into the national health insurance program. Jamkesmas is not being formally marketed, as it has been oversubscribed since its inception in 2008. JamkesmasPopulation covered Target Populations: Below Poverty Line
Coverage Level: 76.4 million Though the scheme has never been formally marketed, Jamkesmas has enrolled more beneficiaries than any other Indonesian health insurance plan. Its target population is defined using an annually administered national survey known as the SUSENAS according to daily household consumption estimates. SUSENAS is a social and economic household survey used to define total household consumption for GDP estimation purposes. Based on standard definitions of the poor in terms of daily household consumption, the total number of poor has been defined. The sub-national distribution of this total has also been defined in a similar manner. P.T. Askes remains the administrator of membership in the Jamkesmas program since it has operated the program since 2005. P.T. Askes has a contract with the MoH to administer the membership part of the program separate from other programs. P.T. Askes obtains a list of the number of persons eligible each year from the Central Bureau of Statistics which is a part of Bappenas (the national planning agency). P.T. Askes then distributes the cards and registers enrollees into the program. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) is responsible for the development of a national identity card to be distributed throughout the entire population. When this card has been distributed, it will become the basis for enrollment into the national health insurance program. Jamkesmas is not being formally marketed, as it has been oversubscribed since its inception in 2008. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kyrgyz Republic: Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) |
|
5.2 million |
Kyrgyzstan offers free primary health care services to all citizens through the State Guaranteed Benefits Package (SGPB) regardless of insurance status. By 2003, 98% of the population was enrolled with a Family Group Practice (FGP) for their primary health care needs. Read full sectionKyrgyzstan offers free primary health care services to all citizens through the State Guaranteed Benefits Package (SGPB) regardless of insurance status. By 2003, 98% of the population was enrolled with a Family Group Practice (FGP) for their primary health care needs. Enrollees choose a FGP of their choice and are free to move between FGPs once per year during the annual registration period. Population groups covered by the MHIF include formal sector employees, civil servants, pensioners, the registered unemployed, children and students under age 21, welfare benefit recipients, farmers, and the self-employed. In 2001, over 80% of the population was covered by the MHIF. Table 3: Coverage additions (1997-2001): Population groups, sources of financing and benefits
Source: Jakab, M., and Manjieva, E. Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 5.2 million Kyrgyzstan offers free primary health care services to all citizens through the State Guaranteed Benefits Package (SGPB) regardless of insurance status. By 2003, 98% of the population was enrolled with a Family Group Practice (FGP) for their primary health care needs. Enrollees choose a FGP of their choice and are free to move between FGPs once per year during the annual registration period. Population groups covered by the MHIF include formal sector employees, civil servants, pensioners, the registered unemployed, children and students under age 21, welfare benefit recipients, farmers, and the self-employed. In 2001, over 80% of the population was covered by the MHIF. Table 3: Coverage additions (1997-2001): Population groups, sources of financing and benefits
Source: Jakab, M., and Manjieva, E. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile: National Health Fund (FONASA) |
|
11 million |
Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. Read full sectionEnrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 National Health Fund (FONASA)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 11 million Enrollment into FONASA or ISAPREs tends to be tied to income, with lower income individuals joining FONASA and higher income individuals enrolling in an ISAPRE. In 2003, the mean income of ISAPRE members was four times higher than that of FONASA members. Formal sector workers must enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income or pension (2,000USD monthly maximum) to healthcare. Those who do not work in the formal sector have the option to enroll by allocating 7% of their monthly income, but are not required to do so. These groups can enroll with either FONASA or an ISAPRE of their choice. The indigent and the unemployed are entitled to free coverage by FONASA. FONASA divides its beneficiary population into four categories based on income. Category A is composed of the indigent, category B is composed of the very low income population, category C is composed of the lower-middle income population, and category D is composed of the higher-middle income population. Copayment rates are based on these categories. In 2005, FONASA enrollees numbered 11,329,481, about 70% of the population. ISAPRE enrollees accounted for 2,660,338 during the same year, equaling 17% of the population. In 2006 there were 15 ISAPREs, but over two thirds of members belonged to the three largest: Banmedica, Consalud, and ING Salud. Open ISAPREs are available to the population at large, while closed ISAPREs are only available to particular groups of individuals such as professional associations. Table 1: Individuals covered per category
Source: Bitran, R., Urcullo, G., 106 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ghana: National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) |
|
12 million |
Each Ghanaian district has a District Wide Mutual Health Insurance (DWMHI) scheme, and each metropolis has two such schemes. Contributions to SSNIT are automatic for members of the DWMHIs. The DWMHI schemes have their own management structures and a certain level of autonomy in the setting of premiums and other costs, although these have to be kept within the limits established by the NHIA. As with the other CBHI schemes, membership is voluntary, although there are plans to eventually introduce compulsory membership. Read full sectionEach Ghanaian district has a District Wide Mutual Health Insurance (DWMHI) scheme, and each metropolis has two such schemes. Contributions to SSNIT are automatic for members of the DWMHIs. The DWMHI schemes have their own management structures and a certain level of autonomy in the setting of premiums and other costs, although these have to be kept within the limits established by the NHIA. As with the other CBHI schemes, membership is voluntary, although there are plans to eventually introduce compulsory membership. The DWMHI schemes have their own management structures and have a certain level of autonomy in the setting of premiums and the charging of other costs, although these have to be kept within the limits established by the NHIA. As one of the reasons for the NHIS’s existence is to stop out-of-pocket healthcare payments, there are no deductibles, and no copayments have to be made by NHIS members when accessing healthcare. As one of the reasons for the NHIS's existence is to stop out-of-pocket healthcare payments, there are no deductibles and no copayments. Enrollment: Contributions to SSNIT are automatic for members of DWMHI schemes because of the health insurance deductions made from their SSNIT contributions, and are only required to pay an initial registration fee. The premium structure therefore applies only to those who work in the informal economy or who are not SSNIT contributors. These members pay their premiums to the DWMHI schemes directly. The schemes employ collectors who move between houses and market stalls to receive premium payments. Alternatively, premiums can be paid to banks, or to designated pharmacies or ‘chemical shops.’ Premiums can be paid at any time during the year – there is no set registration period. Exemptions: Exemptions from premium payments exist for SSNIT contributors, SSNIT pensioners, those over the age of 70, and for those classed as indigent. Indigents are classified as those people who:
Currently all children under the age under 18 are exempted from NHIS premium payments irrespective of the NHIS membership status of their parents. If parents are NHIS members, then children are covered for free. However, if parents are not NHIS members, children cannot access benefits. National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 12 million Each Ghanaian district has a District Wide Mutual Health Insurance (DWMHI) scheme, and each metropolis has two such schemes. Contributions to SSNIT are automatic for members of the DWMHIs. The DWMHI schemes have their own management structures and a certain level of autonomy in the setting of premiums and other costs, although these have to be kept within the limits established by the NHIA. As with the other CBHI schemes, membership is voluntary, although there are plans to eventually introduce compulsory membership. The DWMHI schemes have their own management structures and have a certain level of autonomy in the setting of premiums and the charging of other costs, although these have to be kept within the limits established by the NHIA. As one of the reasons for the NHIS’s existence is to stop out-of-pocket healthcare payments, there are no deductibles, and no copayments have to be made by NHIS members when accessing healthcare. As one of the reasons for the NHIS's existence is to stop out-of-pocket healthcare payments, there are no deductibles and no copayments. Enrollment: Contributions to SSNIT are automatic for members of DWMHI schemes because of the health insurance deductions made from their SSNIT contributions, and are only required to pay an initial registration fee. The premium structure therefore applies only to those who work in the informal economy or who are not SSNIT contributors. These members pay their premiums to the DWMHI schemes directly. The schemes employ collectors who move between houses and market stalls to receive premium payments. Alternatively, premiums can be paid to banks, or to designated pharmacies or ‘chemical shops.’ Premiums can be paid at any time during the year – there is no set registration period. Exemptions: Exemptions from premium payments exist for SSNIT contributors, SSNIT pensioners, those over the age of 70, and for those classed as indigent. Indigents are classified as those people who:
Currently all children under the age under 18 are exempted from NHIS premium payments irrespective of the NHIS membership status of their parents. If parents are NHIS members, then children are covered for free. However, if parents are not NHIS members, children cannot access benefits. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria: National Health Insurance System |
|
5 million |
Health insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. Read full sectionHealth insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. In the Informal Sector Program, the self-employed and individuals living in rural communities enroll themselves. The self-employed must join with at least 500 other members who are occupation based (ie: taxi drivers) to qualify. Rural dwellers have a similar modus operandi, but participants need to belong to the same community rather than the same occupational group. These Social Health Insurance Schemes are self-governed, with elections held to determine who will represent the community. In order to stay enrolled, members are expected to make a monthly contribution actuarially determined based on the benefits package of their choice. Participants requiring specialist or longer treatment would need to pay for the balance from what they are entitled from the common pool. These schemes are expected to cover more than 60% of the rural and self-employed population, though due to poor data collection, the exact population enrolled is difficult to determine. The enrollment levels in private insurance is uncertain, but based on submissions from private insurers to NHIS, less than 1 million people are privately insured. The NHIS utilizes 61 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) as health managers for paying healthcare providers, quality assurance, and registration of enrollees and sensitization of participants as part of improving transparency of the system. HMOs contract with the NHIS to manage the enrollment of individuals in health insurance schemes; to collect their payments; pay the healthcare providers; and to provide basic quality management of the health insurance scheme that covers formal employees. National Health Insurance SystemPopulation covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 5 million Health insurance is obtained either through private insurers or the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). About 5 million people are enrolled in the 3 NHIS Programs, which represents just about 3% of the population. In the Formal Sector Program, employees in the formal sector who pay premiums are covered, in addition to their spouse and up to 4 dependants. Companies that employ more than 10 workers are responsible for enrollment of their employees. In the Informal Sector Program, the self-employed and individuals living in rural communities enroll themselves. The self-employed must join with at least 500 other members who are occupation based (ie: taxi drivers) to qualify. Rural dwellers have a similar modus operandi, but participants need to belong to the same community rather than the same occupational group. These Social Health Insurance Schemes are self-governed, with elections held to determine who will represent the community. In order to stay enrolled, members are expected to make a monthly contribution actuarially determined based on the benefits package of their choice. Participants requiring specialist or longer treatment would need to pay for the balance from what they are entitled from the common pool. These schemes are expected to cover more than 60% of the rural and self-employed population, though due to poor data collection, the exact population enrolled is difficult to determine. The enrollment levels in private insurance is uncertain, but based on submissions from private insurers to NHIS, less than 1 million people are privately insured. The NHIS utilizes 61 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) as health managers for paying healthcare providers, quality assurance, and registration of enrollees and sensitization of participants as part of improving transparency of the system. HMOs contract with the NHIS to manage the enrollment of individuals in health insurance schemes; to collect their payments; pay the healthcare providers; and to provide basic quality management of the health insurance scheme that covers formal employees. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS) |
|
143 million |
Brazil’s health system is based on the notion of free, universal care. In 1998, 71.2% of the population reported that they had a regular-use service. In 2003, this number had increased to 80%. This is significant, since it means that individuals have a service which they use as an entry point into the health system. While 100 % of the population is able to receive services under the SUS, approximately 25% opt for private insurance coverage. Read full sectionBrazil’s health system is based on the notion of free, universal care. In 1998, 71.2% of the population reported that they had a regular-use service. In 2003, this number had increased to 80%. This is significant, since it means that individuals have a service which they use as an entry point into the health system. While 100 % of the population is able to receive services under the SUS, approximately 25% opt for private insurance coverage. The Brazilian Supplementary Health System (SHS) served 33 million Brazilians in 2002, or 19% of the population. By 2007, it accounted for more than 50% of health care expenditure, yet it served less than 30% of the population. Health care operators within the SHS are grouped into categories by the Agency for Supplementary Health within the MOH, depending on their economic and financial status. Ordered by market share in 2002, these categories are group medicine, medical cooperatives, health insurance, charity, self-management, group dentistry, and dentistry cooperatives. Most of these plans are connected to employment. The majority of these plans tend to be small or medium in size and operate mostly through contractual arrangements with doctors’ offices and hospitals. In 2002, group medicine, medical cooperatives and health insurance served around 80% of supplementary users and accounted for 90% of billing. Initially, private prepayment plans had an incentive not to provide comprehensive coverage to enrollees, as high-cost procedures were usually funneled to the SUS for treatment. However, in 1999, the government instituted a norm that allows it to recover the costs associated with services rendered by the SUS to beneficiaries of private health plans. This norm is implemented through the National Supplementary Health Council (CNSS). Unified Health System (SUS)Population covered Target Populations: All populations
Coverage Level: 143 million Brazil’s health system is based on the notion of free, universal care. In 1998, 71.2% of the population reported that they had a regular-use service. In 2003, this number had increased to 80%. This is significant, since it means that individuals have a service which they use as an entry point into the health system. While 100 % of the population is able to receive services under the SUS, approximately 25% opt for private insurance coverage. The Brazilian Supplementary Health System (SHS) served 33 million Brazilians in 2002, or 19% of the population. By 2007, it accounted for more than 50% of health care expenditure, yet it served less than 30% of the population. Health care operators within the SHS are grouped into categories by the Agency for Supplementary Health within the MOH, depending on their economic and financial status. Ordered by market share in 2002, these categories are group medicine, medical cooperatives, health insurance, charity, self-management, group dentistry, and dentistry cooperatives. Most of these plans are connected to employment. The majority of these plans tend to be small or medium in size and operate mostly through contractual arrangements with doctors’ offices and hospitals. In 2002, group medicine, medical cooperatives and health insurance served around 80% of supplementary users and accounted for 90% of billing. Initially, private prepayment plans had an incentive not to provide comprehensive coverage to enrollees, as high-cost procedures were usually funneled to the SUS for treatment. However, in 1999, the government instituted a norm that allows it to recover the costs associated with services rendered by the SUS to beneficiaries of private health plans. This norm is implemented through the National Supplementary Health Council (CNSS). |