Compare: Institutional structure

Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage

The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.


Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.


Program Key Actors in Insurance Administration Organizational Structure Collections Responsibility Operations Responsibility Oversight Responsibility Institutional structures
Estonia: Estonian Health Insurance Fund
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs.

Read full section

The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs.

The Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF) is responsible for the financing of the health system. Its responsibilities include:

  • Purchasing health care services by contracting with service providers
  • Paying for services rendered
  • Reimbursing enrollees for pharmaceuticals, sick leave, and maternity leave.

A 15 member supervisory board is responsible for EHIF results. This board is composed of representatives from employer organizations, insured individuals’ organizations, and the state. This board approves the four year development plan and the annual budget. The supervisory board also composes necessary reports and selects providers for contracting. It also has the authority to examine and audit all documents. The management board is responsible for daily EHIF operations. Under the management board, the central and four regional departments conduct needs assessments, contract with providers, and process claims.

The government plays a role in planning and regulating the health system by:

  • Approving acts regulating public health issues
  • Approving development plans for the hospital network
  • Nominating members to the EHIF Supervisory Board

The health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs is responsible for:

  • Developing and implementing health policy
  • Supervising health service quality and access

Table 2: Influence on decisions made by the EHIF

Decision-makingAppointment of supervisory boardAppointment of management boardFinancingServicesPricesPayment methodsContractingReservesFund management
President------------------
Parliament----+++++--+--
Government+++++++++++++--
Ministry of Social Affairs+++++++++++--
Ministry of Finance----++--------+--
Supervisory board--++++++++++++
Management board--+--++++++++
Providers------+++++----

(++ Strong Influence; + Moderate Influence; -- No Influence)
Source: Habicht T

County governments are responsible for:

  • Announcing family doctor vacancies
  • Approving family doctor post appointments
  • Assigning family doctor service areas
  • Organizing the supervision of practices at the county level

Organization Structure of the Health Care System

All health care providers within Estonia function as private parties operating under the purview of private law. Family practices are organized as private businesses or joint-stock companies, while hospitals are organized as for-profit joint stock companies or non-profit foundations.

Kyrgyz Republic: Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF)
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The Kyrgyz health system is centralized at the national level. The Ministry of Health is responsible for health policy, regulation and the oversight of the health care system. Funds collection, pooling, and health purchasing is managed by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) in the capital city of Bishkek. The MHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the sole purchasing agency for health services within the Kyrgyz health system.

Read full section

The Kyrgyz health system is centralized at the national level. The Ministry of Health is responsible for health policy, regulation and the oversight of the health care system. Funds collection, pooling, and health purchasing is managed by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) in the capital city of Bishkek. The MHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the sole purchasing agency for health services within the Kyrgyz health system.

The MHIF is an agency of the MOH responsible for collecting premiums and for funding individual health services in the SGBP and the Additional Outpatient Drug Benefit. The MHIF is responsible for contracting with primary health care providers and hospitals and for paying them for services they provide to enrollees.

The Ministry of Health is responsible for creating a unified state policy for the health sector, functioning as the steward of health care in Kyrgyzstan. Under this banner, the MOH has the following responsibilities:

  • Develop the State Guarantee Benefits Package (SGBP).
  • Develop draft laws and other regulations in the health sector and submit them for consideration to the Government.
  • Organize and implement the registration, licensing, and accounting of medical and pharmaceutical personnel.
  • Supervise and coordinate the quality of medical education within the country.
  • Provide for continuous operation of high-tech medical equipment and introduce new technologies at the tertiary level.
  • Coordinate the activities of the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) although the relationship between the MOH and MHIF is further evolving due to the recent separation of the MHIF.
  • Serve as the purchaser for some of the health program budgets including public health, medical education, and high-technology services.
  • Coordinate public health activities.
  • Support the charitable and humanitarian activities of NGOs, associations, movements and individuals within the health sector.
  • Conduct internal audits of compliance with procurement procedures, financial operations, accounting systems in health organizations and their subordinate institutions.
Mali: Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Mutuelles
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Mutuelles
  • Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

Read full section

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

 Organization chart of the Mutuelle system

Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system.

Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system

CommitteeRoleCompositionOperating procedures
Pilot Phase Steering and Monitoring Committee (CPSPP) at the national levelStrategic management and decision-making that contribute to achieving the following goals:
  • Validate the annual development operating plans for the Mutuelle system, including the financial framework
  • Recruit the implementation agencies
  • Raise the funds needed to implement the strategy
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Give orientation and instructions to achieve the strategy’s results
Chairs - Secretaries General MDSSPA, MS, MPFEF

Members - CPS/SSDSPF, DNS, DNPSES, DNDS, APCAM, APCMM, CCIM, CNC, AMM, UTM, DNI, HCCT, DNB, ANAM, CANAM, FENASCOM, Health professional associations, technical and financial partners, National Federation of Mutuelles
The Committee meets twice a year and reports on its work to the Ministers of Social Protection and Health
National level Technical Committee (TC)Technical coordination of activities carried out under the Strategy Pilot:
  • Validate the training materials
  • Validate the Mutuelle management tools
  • Validate the communication plan
  • Assess the investment requirements
  • Assess the results of activities carried out as part of this strategy
  • Send the assessment of the results achieved to the CPSPP
  • Submit all the corrections it deems necessary to promote achieving the objectives to the CPSPP
Chair - DNPSES Director

Members - DNDS, DNPSES, CPS, DNS, UTM, CAMASC, DNB, AMM, National Federation of Mutuelles
The TC meets at least three times a year and reports on its work to the CPSPP
Regional Monitoring Committee (CSR)Monitoring of the activities that are planned under the strategy at the regional level. All the technical parameters, the draft laws and the organizing of unions of district Mutuelles are determined and the Local (District) Monitoring Committee is fully involved:
  • Facilitate the implementation of scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Send the evaluation of the results to the TC
  • Propose to the TC all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - Governor

Members - Decentralized government units (Finances, Social Development and Health), Regional Assembly, Regional Federation of Mutuelles, FERASCOM, cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSR meets at least four times a year and reports on its work to the TC
District Monitoring Committee (CSL)Monitoring of the activities planned under the strategy at the district level:
  • Facilitate the implementation of the scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Submit the evaluation of the results to the CSR
  • Propose to the CSR all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - District prefect

Members - Decentralized government units (Finance, Social Development and Health), District Council, District Federation of Mutuelles, FELASCOM, agricultural cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSL meets at least four times a year and reports to the CSR on its work
Communal Monitoring Committee (CSC)Monitoring of the status of strategy implementation at the commune level:
  • Report on the status of implementation of the planned activities
  • Make decisions to remove the obstacles that prevent the communal Mutuelle from working properly
  • Report to the CSL
Chair - Mayor(s)

Members - Decentralized technical entities, ASACO, Communal health Mutuelle, local NGOs, village councils

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED

Body and systemRoleRepresentation
Board of directors (RAMED and AMO)
  • Adopt the budget and annual activities program
  • Determine the annual qualitative and quantitative Objectives that the CANAM or the ANAM is to achieve
  • Authorize the implementing regulations for the system
  • Authorize the Managing Director (MD) to sign all the contracts and conventions that are binding on CANAM or ANAM for a period longer than 24 months (for CANAM) or that exceed CFAF 10 million (for ANAM)
  • Determine the organization of the Fund or the Agency
  • Approve the financial statements for the fiscal year and the report on the MD’s activities
  • Approve other investment and real estate transactions and real estate guarantees
AMO - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of the Civil Service, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defense, Associations of employers, workers, retires, MPs, and CANAM

RAMED - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Administration, Ministry of Health, High Council of Territorial Governments, Association of District and Regional Governments of Mali, Association of Municipalities of Mali, National Federation of Community Health Associations (FENASCOM), ANAM
Managing Director (RAMED and AMO)
  • Manage, coordinate, lead and oversee all CANAM or ANAM activities
MD appointed by a decree of the Council of Ministers based on a proposal from the Minister of Social Protection
Delegated management bodies (AMO)
  • Collect dues
  • Pay for care services
The Mali Social Security Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS)

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

Rwanda: Mutuelles de Sante
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Mutuelles
  • District/Local Government
  • Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government

The health system is organized on a 3-tier pyramid system composed of central, district, and sector levels. The central government is managed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and is responsible for the stewardship of the Mutuelles program, focusing on policy development, capacity building, monitoring and evaluation of operational programs, and resource mobilization. The central level monitors and coordinates technical and logistic support and training at the district and sector levels. The central level is also in charge of the payment to national tertiary care hospitals.

Read full section

The health system is organized on a 3-tier pyramid system composed of central, district, and sector levels. The central government is managed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and is responsible for the stewardship of the Mutuelles program, focusing on policy development, capacity building, monitoring and evaluation of operational programs, and resource mobilization. The central level monitors and coordinates technical and logistic support and training at the district and sector levels. The central level is also in charge of the payment to national tertiary care hospitals.

The district level is composed of about 5 sectors, with roughly 250,000-500,000 people each (Rwanda has 30 districts in total), and at least one hospital and secondary care facility. A board of directors governs the district Mutuelle and a permanent salaried agent conduct audits and overviews. At the district level, the Mutuelle Fund manages member premium subsidies and disburses funds to the appropriate district and sector level facilities based on need and service utilization. Districts guide and facilitate the administrative, logistical, technical, and political supervision, training, and management of the sector level Mutuelles. The district level is also responsible for contractual relations with the district hospital, hospital reimbursement, and quality-of-care supervision at the district hospital levels.

The sector-level includes roughly 50,000 people, with at least one health center for primary care. Each sector has a Mutuelle that is managed by community elected officials. At the sector level, Mutuelles are owned and privately managed by their members. Sector level Mutuelle organizations adopt a Constitution and By-laws, through which they define the organizational structure, roles and functions of management, and election of organizational leaders. These leaders then determine benefit packages, annual premiums and periodicity of the subscriptions, establish conventions on care and health services, service providers and reimbursement. In addition, these sector-level Mutuelles are responsible for recruitment of members and membership collections, as well as monitoring and evaluation of local health and reimbursing health centers.

In 2009 the government created the Rwanda Social Security Board which merges Rwanda Health Insurance Scheme (RAMA) and Military Medical Insurance (MMI) with the Society Security Fund with the objective of improving performance and decision-making.

Reformed Rwandan Health System

Ghana: National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS)
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government

The National Health Insurance Authority is the national governing body of the NHIS. Each DWMHI scheme is managed by a Board, which is elected by a General Assembly comprised of Community Health Insurance Committee (CHIC) representatives. Monitoring is carried out at all levels, including by the NHIS, district schemes, and health care providers.

Read full section

The National Health Insurance Authority is the national governing body of the NHIS. Each DWMHI scheme is managed by a Board, which is elected by a General Assembly comprised of Community Health Insurance Committee (CHIC) representatives. Monitoring is carried out at all levels, including by the NHIS, district schemes, and health care providers.

See Figure 1 below for an illustrative depiction of the institutional structure of the NHIS.

National Health Insurance Scheme, Ghana, Institutional Framework

Its mandate is “to secure the implementation of a national health insurance policy that ensures basic healthcare services to all residents.” Section 3 of the Act establishes the governing body of the Authority, known as the National Health Insurance Council (NHIC), which administers the National Health Insurance Fund. The President of Ghana is given sole power to appoint the chairperson and members of the Council.

CHIC representatives represent geographically determined ‘Health Insurance Communities’ within each district. The CHIC exists officially to oversee the collection of contributions within its designated Health Insurance Community, to supervise the deposit of these into the District Health Insurance Fund, and to represent community interests in the management structures of the DWMHIS.

The figure below presents an illustrative depiction of the financial structure of the NHIS, including sources of cash flow and the organizational structure of the management of NHIS financial resources.

Cash flow of the NHIS

Nigeria: National Health Insurance System
  • Central Government
  • Other
  • Centralized
  • Other
  • Central Government
  • Other
  • Central Government

The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) is the body responsible for regulation of the system and the different health insurance schemes. The Governing Board of the National Health Insurance Scheme is the National Health Insurance Council (NHIC). NHIC works to regulate the scheme (including setting standards, determining contribution rates, providing technical support, etc), license HMOs and providers, train health care providers, and manage the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF).

Read full section

The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) is the body responsible for regulation of the system and the different health insurance schemes. The Governing Board of the National Health Insurance Scheme is the National Health Insurance Council (NHIC). NHIC works to regulate the scheme (including setting standards, determining contribution rates, providing technical support, etc), license HMOs and providers, train health care providers, and manage the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF).

HMOS are licensed by the NHIS to facilitate the provision of healthcare benefits to contributors under the Formal Sector Social health Insurance Program; to interface between eligible contributors, including voluntary contributors and the healthcare providers, ensure member registration, public education about the schemes, collect premiums from members and employers, contract with providers, process claims, and pay claims directly to providers.

HMO Activities

The informal sector scheme under the NHIS is managed by a Board of Trustees composed of the Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer and four others. A clerk is appointed to carry out clerical and accounting duties. The Board of Trustees has executive power and is responsible for collecting contributions from participants, paying providers for services rendered, and operating a bank account with an NHIS accredited Bank.

The Nigerian system is organized as a federation and divided into three tiers: federal, state, and local. The federal government sets overall policy direction and standards, implements national immunization programs, and oversees federally funded tertiary health facilities. The states undertake policy making and regulation as well as financial responsibility for the personnel, operating costs, and capital investment of the tertiary, secondary, and primary care facilities. The 774 local government associations (LGAs) are responsible for primary health care delivery, under the guidance and supervision of federal and state departments of primary health care. LGAs tend to exert the least influence in this system, and frequently suffer from insufficient funding.

Philippines: PhilHealth
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services.

PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes.

Read full section

The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services.

PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector.

PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years.

Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses.

For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth.

Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS)
  • Central Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Central Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government
  • State Government

The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles.

Read full section

The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles.

The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning.

At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).

 Institutional Makeup of the Brazilian Health System

Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary.

In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote.