The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Key Actors in Insurance Administration | Organizational Structure | Collections Responsibility | Operations Responsibility | Oversight Responsibility | Institutional structures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vietnam: Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance Schemes |
|
|
|
|
|
The MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. Read full sectionThe MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. The VSS is a government agency responsible for the administration of the various social insurance programs, including the collection of insurance premiums. In addition to collecting revenues, VSS’s main responsibility is to issue health insurance cards and reimburse service providers. The MoF manages the tax-transfer process that provides the resources that local governments use to provide budget support to public facilities and to pay the VSS for subsidized enrollees. VSS collects mandatory (and voluntary) contributions to the health insurance program, then pools these with the subsidies from the MoF, and pays the providers for care received by people covered by VSS. Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance SchemesInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. The VSS is a government agency responsible for the administration of the various social insurance programs, including the collection of insurance premiums. In addition to collecting revenues, VSS’s main responsibility is to issue health insurance cards and reimburse service providers. The MoF manages the tax-transfer process that provides the resources that local governments use to provide budget support to public facilities and to pay the VSS for subsidized enrollees. VSS collects mandatory (and voluntary) contributions to the health insurance program, then pools these with the subsidies from the MoF, and pays the providers for care received by people covered by VSS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estonia: Estonian Health Insurance Fund |
|
|
|
|
The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs. Read full sectionThe Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs. The Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF) is responsible for the financing of the health system. Its responsibilities include:
A 15 member supervisory board is responsible for EHIF results. This board is composed of representatives from employer organizations, insured individuals’ organizations, and the state. This board approves the four year development plan and the annual budget. The supervisory board also composes necessary reports and selects providers for contracting. It also has the authority to examine and audit all documents. The management board is responsible for daily EHIF operations. Under the management board, the central and four regional departments conduct needs assessments, contract with providers, and process claims. The government plays a role in planning and regulating the health system by:
The health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs is responsible for:
Table 2: Influence on decisions made by the EHIF
(++ Strong Influence; + Moderate Influence; -- No Influence) County governments are responsible for:
All health care providers within Estonia function as private parties operating under the purview of private law. Family practices are organized as private businesses or joint-stock companies, while hospitals are organized as for-profit joint stock companies or non-profit foundations. Estonian Health Insurance FundInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration:
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs. The Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF) is responsible for the financing of the health system. Its responsibilities include:
A 15 member supervisory board is responsible for EHIF results. This board is composed of representatives from employer organizations, insured individuals’ organizations, and the state. This board approves the four year development plan and the annual budget. The supervisory board also composes necessary reports and selects providers for contracting. It also has the authority to examine and audit all documents. The management board is responsible for daily EHIF operations. Under the management board, the central and four regional departments conduct needs assessments, contract with providers, and process claims. The government plays a role in planning and regulating the health system by:
The health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs is responsible for:
Table 2: Influence on decisions made by the EHIF
(++ Strong Influence; + Moderate Influence; -- No Influence) County governments are responsible for:
All health care providers within Estonia function as private parties operating under the purview of private law. Family practices are organized as private businesses or joint-stock companies, while hospitals are organized as for-profit joint stock companies or non-profit foundations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia: Jamkesmas |
|
|
|
|
|
Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. Read full sectionPresently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. JamkesmasInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government, Commercial insurers
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| : Taiwan: National Health Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
The organization of health administration in Taiwan is divided into two structures: The National level and the local level. The National Health Insurance (NHI) system is administered by the central government, which has the overall responsibility for the formulation of health care policies and the regulation of health care services throughout Taiwan. Read full sectionThe organization of health administration in Taiwan is divided into two structures: The National level and the local level. The National Health Insurance (NHI) system is administered by the central government, which has the overall responsibility for the formulation of health care policies and the regulation of health care services throughout Taiwan. The Department of Health (DOH) has jurisdiction over the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI), the NHI supervisory Committee, the NHI Dispute Mediation Committee, and the NHI Medical Expenditure Negotiation Committee, all of which plan and monitor tasks that relate to the NHI. BNHI acts as the primary executive of the NHI. BNHI contracts with health care facilities and is the primary organization responsible for administering the National Health Insurance system, collecting premiums from the insured and regulating health care services for the insured. Under the executive branch, Taiwan has 6 regional divisions divided into 25 local health bureaus under city or county local governments. These local bureaus are responsible for daily operations of health management and directly handle underwriting operations, insurance premium collection, review and payment of medical claims, and management of NHI-contracted medical care institutions. The bureaus all have close relationships to local level health and aid in managing the contracted medical institutions through quality counseling, and management of emergency rescue services, mental health services, and human resources. In addition, each of the 25 county governments in Taiwan has a health liaison bureau, which is responsible for the operation of public health centers within their geographical region under the guidance of the health department. While the NHI is governed by the central government, most management of NHI is decentralized. The BNHI is the primary overseer of NHI, acts to set the annual national budget, and implements most policy in a centralized, top-down fashion. The BNHI also acts as the primary intermediary between the insured and the providers. Oversight of the NHI is also provided by the NHI Supervisory Committee (NHISC), which provides a forum for social associations, employers and providers to communicate with one another; the NHI Disputes Mediation Committee (NHIDM), which mediates disputes between the insured and providers; the NHI Expenditure Negotiation Committee (NHIENC), which negotiates the payments for providers under the Global Budget Payment; and the NHI Task Force. The daily management of the NHI, however, is highly decentralized. The BNHI distributes responsibilities to the 6 regional divisions and local governments. National Health InsuranceInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The organization of health administration in Taiwan is divided into two structures: The National level and the local level. The National Health Insurance (NHI) system is administered by the central government, which has the overall responsibility for the formulation of health care policies and the regulation of health care services throughout Taiwan. The Department of Health (DOH) has jurisdiction over the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI), the NHI supervisory Committee, the NHI Dispute Mediation Committee, and the NHI Medical Expenditure Negotiation Committee, all of which plan and monitor tasks that relate to the NHI. BNHI acts as the primary executive of the NHI. BNHI contracts with health care facilities and is the primary organization responsible for administering the National Health Insurance system, collecting premiums from the insured and regulating health care services for the insured. Under the executive branch, Taiwan has 6 regional divisions divided into 25 local health bureaus under city or county local governments. These local bureaus are responsible for daily operations of health management and directly handle underwriting operations, insurance premium collection, review and payment of medical claims, and management of NHI-contracted medical care institutions. The bureaus all have close relationships to local level health and aid in managing the contracted medical institutions through quality counseling, and management of emergency rescue services, mental health services, and human resources. In addition, each of the 25 county governments in Taiwan has a health liaison bureau, which is responsible for the operation of public health centers within their geographical region under the guidance of the health department. While the NHI is governed by the central government, most management of NHI is decentralized. The BNHI is the primary overseer of NHI, acts to set the annual national budget, and implements most policy in a centralized, top-down fashion. The BNHI also acts as the primary intermediary between the insured and the providers. Oversight of the NHI is also provided by the NHI Supervisory Committee (NHISC), which provides a forum for social associations, employers and providers to communicate with one another; the NHI Disputes Mediation Committee (NHIDM), which mediates disputes between the insured and providers; the NHI Expenditure Negotiation Committee (NHIENC), which negotiates the payments for providers under the Global Budget Payment; and the NHI Task Force. The daily management of the NHI, however, is highly decentralized. The BNHI distributes responsibilities to the 6 regional divisions and local governments. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya: National Hospital Insurance Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. Read full sectionWhen the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. The NHIF has decentralized its operations to 31 local branches and 82 service points across the country. These branches are responsible for claims processing and quality assurance, enrollment and collection of premiums (especially from informal sector employees and other ‘voluntary’ enrollees), and marketing of the program. The branches also implement quality programs alongside contracted providers, and execute most of the monitoring and evaluation programs within the NHIF. Since its separation from the MOH, the NHIF is no longer held directly accountable by the MOH. Several new mechanisms for ensuring accountability have been instituted, however. These include the Board’s Audit and Integrity Subcommittee, the Auditor General of the Kenyan Government (which files annual reports to the Parliament on the performance of each government agency, including the NHIF), the NHIF’s Efficiency Monitoring Unit (which handles complaints and performs periodic audits of the operations of the agency) and finally the NHIF Ombudsman (which receives and mediates complaints).
Implementing partners and development partners aid the MOH in implementing health plans by providing services such as funding, specialized care, research, training or health insurance. The majority of them are parastatals who receive a portion of their annual funds from the Government of Kenya and have to raise the other part themselves through cost sharing or other sources, such as the National Hospital Insurance Fund, the Kenyatta National Hospital, and Kenya Medical Research Institute, though they can also be private organizations. National Hospital Insurance FundInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. The NHIF has decentralized its operations to 31 local branches and 82 service points across the country. These branches are responsible for claims processing and quality assurance, enrollment and collection of premiums (especially from informal sector employees and other ‘voluntary’ enrollees), and marketing of the program. The branches also implement quality programs alongside contracted providers, and execute most of the monitoring and evaluation programs within the NHIF. Since its separation from the MOH, the NHIF is no longer held directly accountable by the MOH. Several new mechanisms for ensuring accountability have been instituted, however. These include the Board’s Audit and Integrity Subcommittee, the Auditor General of the Kenyan Government (which files annual reports to the Parliament on the performance of each government agency, including the NHIF), the NHIF’s Efficiency Monitoring Unit (which handles complaints and performs periodic audits of the operations of the agency) and finally the NHIF Ombudsman (which receives and mediates complaints).
Implementing partners and development partners aid the MOH in implementing health plans by providing services such as funding, specialized care, research, training or health insurance. The majority of them are parastatals who receive a portion of their annual funds from the Government of Kenya and have to raise the other part themselves through cost sharing or other sources, such as the National Hospital Insurance Fund, the Kenyatta National Hospital, and Kenya Medical Research Institute, though they can also be private organizations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philippines: PhilHealth |
|
|
|
|
|
The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. Read full sectionThe scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. PhilHealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| India: Rajiv Aarogyasri |
|
|
|
|
Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. Read full sectionAarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. The administrative structure of Aarogyasri is comprised of four main organizations:
The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in operationalizing Aarogyasri:
Rajiv AarogyasriInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration:
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: State Government
Operations Responsibility: State Government, Commercial insurers
Oversight Responsibility: State Government Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. The administrative structure of Aarogyasri is comprised of four main organizations:
The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in operationalizing Aarogyasri:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thailand: Universal Coverage Scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Read full sectionUCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.
While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes. The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances. The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.). The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board. The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Universal Coverage SchemeInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.
While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes. The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances. The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.). The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board. The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. |
Source: National Hospital Insurance Fund
The Kenyan health system is administered from the top down by the Ministry of Health (MOH), which was broken into two Ministries after the post-election turmoil of 2007: the Ministry of Medical Services, and the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Kenya has a Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) to coordinate and support the health care system, which incorporates health partners on all levels. The role of the central government is to formulate policy, set priorities, budget and allocate resources, and regulate service provision through a decentralized framework. Provinces, districts and local community areas are increasingly responsible for implementation and day to day management of the health system.