Compare: Institutional structure

Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage

The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.


Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.


Program Key Actors in Insurance Administration Organizational Structure Collections Responsibility Operations Responsibility Oversight Responsibility Institutional structures
Estonia: Estonian Health Insurance Fund
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs.

Read full section

The Estonian Health System is centralized at the national level. Funds collection is managed by the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. The tax board then transfers the health contribution to the Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF). The EHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the only purchaser for health care services within the country. Health system oversight is carried out by both the EHIF supervisory board as well as the health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs.

The Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF) is responsible for the financing of the health system. Its responsibilities include:

  • Purchasing health care services by contracting with service providers
  • Paying for services rendered
  • Reimbursing enrollees for pharmaceuticals, sick leave, and maternity leave.

A 15 member supervisory board is responsible for EHIF results. This board is composed of representatives from employer organizations, insured individuals’ organizations, and the state. This board approves the four year development plan and the annual budget. The supervisory board also composes necessary reports and selects providers for contracting. It also has the authority to examine and audit all documents. The management board is responsible for daily EHIF operations. Under the management board, the central and four regional departments conduct needs assessments, contract with providers, and process claims.

The government plays a role in planning and regulating the health system by:

  • Approving acts regulating public health issues
  • Approving development plans for the hospital network
  • Nominating members to the EHIF Supervisory Board

The health division of the Ministry of Social Affairs is responsible for:

  • Developing and implementing health policy
  • Supervising health service quality and access

Table 2: Influence on decisions made by the EHIF

Decision-makingAppointment of supervisory boardAppointment of management boardFinancingServicesPricesPayment methodsContractingReservesFund management
President------------------
Parliament----+++++--+--
Government+++++++++++++--
Ministry of Social Affairs+++++++++++--
Ministry of Finance----++--------+--
Supervisory board--++++++++++++
Management board--+--++++++++
Providers------+++++----

(++ Strong Influence; + Moderate Influence; -- No Influence)
Source: Habicht T

County governments are responsible for:

  • Announcing family doctor vacancies
  • Approving family doctor post appointments
  • Assigning family doctor service areas
  • Organizing the supervision of practices at the county level

Organization Structure of the Health Care System

All health care providers within Estonia function as private parties operating under the purview of private law. Family practices are organized as private businesses or joint-stock companies, while hospitals are organized as for-profit joint stock companies or non-profit foundations.

Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health
  • Commercial insurers
  • Centralized
  • Commercial insurers
  • Commercial insurers
  • Central Government

In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs.

Read full section

In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs.

The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs.

Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues.

The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system.

Indonesia: Jamkesmas
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Commercial insurers
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government

Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator.

Read full section

Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator.

A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:

National Soc Sec Council (DJSN)National government agencies (MoH, MoF, MoHA, Menkokesra, Bappenas)Provincial and district governmentsProviders of careInsurer/TPA (Askes/ Jamsostek)
Oversight of schemeX (LR)X (SR)
Financing schemeXX
Setting parameters (benefits package, definitions of poor, etc.)X (LR)X (SR)
Accreditation/Empanelment of providersXX
EnrollmentXXX
Financial management/planningX (LR)X (SR)
Actuarial analysisX (LR)
Setting rate schedules for services/reimbursement ratesX (LR)X (SR)
Claims processing and paymentX (Under Review)XX (District level)
Outreach, Marketing to beneficiaries X
Service deliveryX
Developing clinical information system for monitoring/evalX (LR)X (SR)
Monitoring local-level utilization and other patient informationX (LR) X (SR)
Monitoring national aggregate informationX (LR)
Customer serviceXX

LR = long run; SR = short run

Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required.

Kyrgyz Republic: Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF)
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The Kyrgyz health system is centralized at the national level. The Ministry of Health is responsible for health policy, regulation and the oversight of the health care system. Funds collection, pooling, and health purchasing is managed by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) in the capital city of Bishkek. The MHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the sole purchasing agency for health services within the Kyrgyz health system.

Read full section

The Kyrgyz health system is centralized at the national level. The Ministry of Health is responsible for health policy, regulation and the oversight of the health care system. Funds collection, pooling, and health purchasing is managed by the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) in the capital city of Bishkek. The MHIF is also responsible for the operations of the financing system, as it is the sole purchasing agency for health services within the Kyrgyz health system.

The MHIF is an agency of the MOH responsible for collecting premiums and for funding individual health services in the SGBP and the Additional Outpatient Drug Benefit. The MHIF is responsible for contracting with primary health care providers and hospitals and for paying them for services they provide to enrollees.

The Ministry of Health is responsible for creating a unified state policy for the health sector, functioning as the steward of health care in Kyrgyzstan. Under this banner, the MOH has the following responsibilities:

  • Develop the State Guarantee Benefits Package (SGBP).
  • Develop draft laws and other regulations in the health sector and submit them for consideration to the Government.
  • Organize and implement the registration, licensing, and accounting of medical and pharmaceutical personnel.
  • Supervise and coordinate the quality of medical education within the country.
  • Provide for continuous operation of high-tech medical equipment and introduce new technologies at the tertiary level.
  • Coordinate the activities of the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) although the relationship between the MOH and MHIF is further evolving due to the recent separation of the MHIF.
  • Serve as the purchaser for some of the health program budgets including public health, medical education, and high-technology services.
  • Coordinate public health activities.
  • Support the charitable and humanitarian activities of NGOs, associations, movements and individuals within the health sector.
  • Conduct internal audits of compliance with procurement procedures, financial operations, accounting systems in health organizations and their subordinate institutions.
Mali: Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Mutuelles
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Mutuelles
  • Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

Read full section

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

 Organization chart of the Mutuelle system

Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system.

Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system

CommitteeRoleCompositionOperating procedures
Pilot Phase Steering and Monitoring Committee (CPSPP) at the national levelStrategic management and decision-making that contribute to achieving the following goals:
  • Validate the annual development operating plans for the Mutuelle system, including the financial framework
  • Recruit the implementation agencies
  • Raise the funds needed to implement the strategy
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Give orientation and instructions to achieve the strategy’s results
Chairs - Secretaries General MDSSPA, MS, MPFEF

Members - CPS/SSDSPF, DNS, DNPSES, DNDS, APCAM, APCMM, CCIM, CNC, AMM, UTM, DNI, HCCT, DNB, ANAM, CANAM, FENASCOM, Health professional associations, technical and financial partners, National Federation of Mutuelles
The Committee meets twice a year and reports on its work to the Ministers of Social Protection and Health
National level Technical Committee (TC)Technical coordination of activities carried out under the Strategy Pilot:
  • Validate the training materials
  • Validate the Mutuelle management tools
  • Validate the communication plan
  • Assess the investment requirements
  • Assess the results of activities carried out as part of this strategy
  • Send the assessment of the results achieved to the CPSPP
  • Submit all the corrections it deems necessary to promote achieving the objectives to the CPSPP
Chair - DNPSES Director

Members - DNDS, DNPSES, CPS, DNS, UTM, CAMASC, DNB, AMM, National Federation of Mutuelles
The TC meets at least three times a year and reports on its work to the CPSPP
Regional Monitoring Committee (CSR)Monitoring of the activities that are planned under the strategy at the regional level. All the technical parameters, the draft laws and the organizing of unions of district Mutuelles are determined and the Local (District) Monitoring Committee is fully involved:
  • Facilitate the implementation of scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Send the evaluation of the results to the TC
  • Propose to the TC all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - Governor

Members - Decentralized government units (Finances, Social Development and Health), Regional Assembly, Regional Federation of Mutuelles, FERASCOM, cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSR meets at least four times a year and reports on its work to the TC
District Monitoring Committee (CSL)Monitoring of the activities planned under the strategy at the district level:
  • Facilitate the implementation of the scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Submit the evaluation of the results to the CSR
  • Propose to the CSR all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - District prefect

Members - Decentralized government units (Finance, Social Development and Health), District Council, District Federation of Mutuelles, FELASCOM, agricultural cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSL meets at least four times a year and reports to the CSR on its work
Communal Monitoring Committee (CSC)Monitoring of the status of strategy implementation at the commune level:
  • Report on the status of implementation of the planned activities
  • Make decisions to remove the obstacles that prevent the communal Mutuelle from working properly
  • Report to the CSL
Chair - Mayor(s)

Members - Decentralized technical entities, ASACO, Communal health Mutuelle, local NGOs, village councils

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED

Body and systemRoleRepresentation
Board of directors (RAMED and AMO)
  • Adopt the budget and annual activities program
  • Determine the annual qualitative and quantitative Objectives that the CANAM or the ANAM is to achieve
  • Authorize the implementing regulations for the system
  • Authorize the Managing Director (MD) to sign all the contracts and conventions that are binding on CANAM or ANAM for a period longer than 24 months (for CANAM) or that exceed CFAF 10 million (for ANAM)
  • Determine the organization of the Fund or the Agency
  • Approve the financial statements for the fiscal year and the report on the MD’s activities
  • Approve other investment and real estate transactions and real estate guarantees
AMO - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of the Civil Service, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defense, Associations of employers, workers, retires, MPs, and CANAM

RAMED - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Administration, Ministry of Health, High Council of Territorial Governments, Association of District and Regional Governments of Mali, Association of Municipalities of Mali, National Federation of Community Health Associations (FENASCOM), ANAM
Managing Director (RAMED and AMO)
  • Manage, coordinate, lead and oversee all CANAM or ANAM activities
MD appointed by a decree of the Council of Ministers based on a proposal from the Minister of Social Protection
Delegated management bodies (AMO)
  • Collect dues
  • Pay for care services
The Mali Social Security Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS)

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

: Taiwan: National Health Insurance
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government

The organization of health administration in Taiwan is divided into two structures: The National level and the local level. The National Health Insurance (NHI) system is administered by the central government, which has the overall responsibility for the formulation of health care policies and the regulation of health care services throughout Taiwan.

Read full section

The organization of health administration in Taiwan is divided into two structures: The National level and the local level. The National Health Insurance (NHI) system is administered by the central government, which has the overall responsibility for the formulation of health care policies and the regulation of health care services throughout Taiwan. The Department of Health (DOH) has jurisdiction over the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI), the NHI supervisory Committee, the NHI Dispute Mediation Committee, and the NHI Medical Expenditure Negotiation Committee, all of which plan and monitor tasks that relate to the NHI. BNHI acts as the primary executive of the NHI. BNHI contracts with health care facilities and is the primary organization responsible for administering the National Health Insurance system, collecting premiums from the insured and regulating health care services for the insured.

Under the executive branch, Taiwan has 6 regional divisions divided into 25 local health bureaus under city or county local governments. These local bureaus are responsible for daily operations of health management and directly handle underwriting operations, insurance premium collection, review and payment of medical claims, and management of NHI-contracted medical care institutions. The bureaus all have close relationships to local level health and aid in managing the contracted medical institutions through quality counseling, and management of emergency rescue services, mental health services, and human resources. In addition, each of the 25 county governments in Taiwan has a health liaison bureau, which is responsible for the operation of public health centers within their geographical region under the guidance of the health department.

While the NHI is governed by the central government, most management of NHI is decentralized. The BNHI is the primary overseer of NHI, acts to set the annual national budget, and implements most policy in a centralized, top-down fashion. The BNHI also acts as the primary intermediary between the insured and the providers. Oversight of the NHI is also provided by the NHI Supervisory Committee (NHISC), which provides a forum for social associations, employers and providers to communicate with one another; the NHI Disputes Mediation Committee (NHIDM), which mediates disputes between the insured and providers; the NHI Expenditure Negotiation Committee (NHIENC), which negotiates the payments for providers under the Global Budget Payment; and the NHI Task Force. The daily management of the NHI, however, is highly decentralized. The BNHI distributes responsibilities to the 6 regional divisions and local governments.

India: Rajiv Aarogyasri
  • Centralized
  • State Government
  • State Government
  • Commercial insurers
  • State Government

Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme.

Read full section

Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme.

The administrative structure of Aarogyasri is comprised of four main organizations:

  • Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust: The Trust is responsible for oversight of the entire insurance program as well as some important administrative functions such as setting benefits and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims, and monitoring.
  • Insurer: The insurer is selected based on a competitive bidding process to bear risk and manage all back-end insurance administration, including claims processing, reimbursements to providers, oversight of hospitals. The Insurer is also responsible for holding health camps in villages to screen, diagnose, treat, and make beneficiaries aware of any health problems they might have; health camps are also used to enroll eligible beneficiaries.
  • Network hospitals: Network hospitals provide care to Aarogyasri beneficiaries.
  • Aarogya Mithras: Aarogya Mithras are patient advocates and assist Aarogyasri beneficiaries to navigate through the system and ensure beneficiaries receive quality care. Aarogya Mithras are also responsible for community outreach.

The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in operationalizing Aarogyasri:

Aarogyasri TrustInsurerNetwork HospitalsAarogya Mithras
Oversight of schemeX
Financing schemeX
Setting parameters (benefits package, empanelment criteria, etc.)XX
Hardware specifications (e.g, systems, card, etc.)XX
Contract management with InsurerX
Accreditation/Empanelment of providersXX
EnrollmentXXX
Financial management/planningX
Actuarial analysisXX
Setting rate schedules for services/reimbursement rates X
Claims processing and paymentXX
Outreach, Marketing to beneficiariesXXX
Service deliveryX
Developing clinical information system for monitoring/evalX X
Monitoring utilization and other patient informationXX
Customer serviceXXX
Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS)
  • Central Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Central Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • State Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government
  • State Government

The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles.

Read full section

The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles.

The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning.

At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).

 Institutional Makeup of the Brazilian Health System

Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary.

In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote.

Thailand: Universal Coverage Scheme
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board.

Read full section

UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests.

Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.

Thailand, the Health Insurance Model, 2007

While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes.

The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances.

The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.).

The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board.

The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests.