The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Key Actors in Insurance Administration | Organizational Structure | Collections Responsibility | Operations Responsibility | Oversight Responsibility | Institutional structures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. Read full sectionIn 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. General System of Social Security in HealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Commercial insurers
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Operations Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mali: Mutuelles |
|
|
|
|
|
Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles. Read full sectionAlthough the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.
Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system. Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system
Source: Ministry of Social Protection For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED
Source: Ministry of Social Protection MutuellesInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government, Mutuelles
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Mutuelles
Operations Responsibility: Mutuelles
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.
Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system. Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system
Source: Ministry of Social Protection For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED
Source: Ministry of Social Protection |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile: National Health Fund (FONASA) |
|
|
|
|
|
The National Health Fund (FONASA) is a public insurer responsible for providing health coverage to persons who contribute 7% of their monthly wages as well as to the indigent. FONASA provides health coverage to all its beneficiaries without exclusions based on age, sex, income, number of family members, or preexisting conditions. It is also responsible for financing both the Institutional and Free Election modalities by collecting, administering, and distributing health resources. FONASA also finances the purchase of equipment, instruments, implements and other infrastructure elements that are needed for the public health system. Read full sectionThe National Health Fund (FONASA) is a public insurer responsible for providing health coverage to persons who contribute 7% of their monthly wages as well as to the indigent. FONASA provides health coverage to all its beneficiaries without exclusions based on age, sex, income, number of family members, or preexisting conditions. It is also responsible for financing both the Institutional and Free Election modalities by collecting, administering, and distributing health resources. FONASA also finances the purchase of equipment, instruments, implements and other infrastructure elements that are needed for the public health system. The Ministry of Health (MOH) exercises many responsibilities within the health system: (1) it formulates, controls, and evaluates general plans and programs within the health sector; (2) it defines national health objectives; (3) it directs all national activities related to the provision of health activities; (4) it establishes general norms relating to technical, administrative, and financial matters within the health sector; (5) it monitors the fulfillment of health norms through the Regional Ministerial Health Secretariats; (6) it evaluates the states of public health issues; and (7) it formulates, evaluates, and implements the Universal Access with Explicit Guarantees (AUGE) plan. The National Health Superintendence was established in 2005 and charged with the responsibility of watching and controlling FONASA and the ISAPREs. Its primary tasks are to license both public and private health providers and to oversee AUGE compliance by both FONASA and the ISAPREs. The Health Insurance Institutions (ISAPREs) are for-profit or non-profit private insurers that must offer a minimum benefits package that is equal to the benefits covered under GES. However, they are free to provide additional coverage to those willing to purchase it.
National Health Fund (FONASA)Institutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government, State Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The National Health Fund (FONASA) is a public insurer responsible for providing health coverage to persons who contribute 7% of their monthly wages as well as to the indigent. FONASA provides health coverage to all its beneficiaries without exclusions based on age, sex, income, number of family members, or preexisting conditions. It is also responsible for financing both the Institutional and Free Election modalities by collecting, administering, and distributing health resources. FONASA also finances the purchase of equipment, instruments, implements and other infrastructure elements that are needed for the public health system. The Ministry of Health (MOH) exercises many responsibilities within the health system: (1) it formulates, controls, and evaluates general plans and programs within the health sector; (2) it defines national health objectives; (3) it directs all national activities related to the provision of health activities; (4) it establishes general norms relating to technical, administrative, and financial matters within the health sector; (5) it monitors the fulfillment of health norms through the Regional Ministerial Health Secretariats; (6) it evaluates the states of public health issues; and (7) it formulates, evaluates, and implements the Universal Access with Explicit Guarantees (AUGE) plan. The National Health Superintendence was established in 2005 and charged with the responsibility of watching and controlling FONASA and the ISAPREs. Its primary tasks are to license both public and private health providers and to oversee AUGE compliance by both FONASA and the ISAPREs. The Health Insurance Institutions (ISAPREs) are for-profit or non-profit private insurers that must offer a minimum benefits package that is equal to the benefits covered under GES. However, they are free to provide additional coverage to those willing to purchase it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philippines: PhilHealth |
|
|
|
|
|
The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. Read full sectionThe scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. PhilHealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thailand: Universal Coverage Scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Read full sectionUCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.
While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes. The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances. The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.). The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board. The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Universal Coverage SchemeInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.
While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes. The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances. The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.). The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board. The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests. |
