The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Key Actors in Insurance Administration | Organizational Structure | Collections Responsibility | Operations Responsibility | Oversight Responsibility | Institutional structures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vietnam: Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance Schemes |
|
|
|
|
|
The MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. Read full sectionThe MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. The VSS is a government agency responsible for the administration of the various social insurance programs, including the collection of insurance premiums. In addition to collecting revenues, VSS’s main responsibility is to issue health insurance cards and reimburse service providers. The MoF manages the tax-transfer process that provides the resources that local governments use to provide budget support to public facilities and to pay the VSS for subsidized enrollees. VSS collects mandatory (and voluntary) contributions to the health insurance program, then pools these with the subsidies from the MoF, and pays the providers for care received by people covered by VSS. Compulsory and Voluntary Health Insurance SchemesInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The MoH is responsible for overseeing all health insurance programs, while the VSS is the main agency implementing the schemes. The Ministry of Labor - Invalids and Social Affairs (MOLISA) is tasked with identifying the beneficiaries of the HCFP. The VSS is a government agency responsible for the administration of the various social insurance programs, including the collection of insurance premiums. In addition to collecting revenues, VSS’s main responsibility is to issue health insurance cards and reimburse service providers. The MoF manages the tax-transfer process that provides the resources that local governments use to provide budget support to public facilities and to pay the VSS for subsidized enrollees. VSS collects mandatory (and voluntary) contributions to the health insurance program, then pools these with the subsidies from the MoF, and pays the providers for care received by people covered by VSS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. Read full sectionIn 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. General System of Social Security in HealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Commercial insurers
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Operations Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia: Jamkesmas |
|
|
|
|
|
Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. Read full sectionPresently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. JamkesmasInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government, Commercial insurers
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mali: Mutuelles |
|
|
|
|
|
Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles. Read full sectionAlthough the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.
Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system. Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system
Source: Ministry of Social Protection For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED
Source: Ministry of Social Protection MutuellesInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government, Mutuelles
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Mutuelles
Operations Responsibility: Mutuelles
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one. For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.
Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system. Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system
Source: Ministry of Social Protection For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED
Source: Ministry of Social Protection |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya: National Hospital Insurance Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. Read full sectionWhen the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. The NHIF has decentralized its operations to 31 local branches and 82 service points across the country. These branches are responsible for claims processing and quality assurance, enrollment and collection of premiums (especially from informal sector employees and other ‘voluntary’ enrollees), and marketing of the program. The branches also implement quality programs alongside contracted providers, and execute most of the monitoring and evaluation programs within the NHIF. Since its separation from the MOH, the NHIF is no longer held directly accountable by the MOH. Several new mechanisms for ensuring accountability have been instituted, however. These include the Board’s Audit and Integrity Subcommittee, the Auditor General of the Kenyan Government (which files annual reports to the Parliament on the performance of each government agency, including the NHIF), the NHIF’s Efficiency Monitoring Unit (which handles complaints and performs periodic audits of the operations of the agency) and finally the NHIF Ombudsman (which receives and mediates complaints).
Implementing partners and development partners aid the MOH in implementing health plans by providing services such as funding, specialized care, research, training or health insurance. The majority of them are parastatals who receive a portion of their annual funds from the Government of Kenya and have to raise the other part themselves through cost sharing or other sources, such as the National Hospital Insurance Fund, the Kenyatta National Hospital, and Kenya Medical Research Institute, though they can also be private organizations. National Hospital Insurance FundInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. The NHIF has decentralized its operations to 31 local branches and 82 service points across the country. These branches are responsible for claims processing and quality assurance, enrollment and collection of premiums (especially from informal sector employees and other ‘voluntary’ enrollees), and marketing of the program. The branches also implement quality programs alongside contracted providers, and execute most of the monitoring and evaluation programs within the NHIF. Since its separation from the MOH, the NHIF is no longer held directly accountable by the MOH. Several new mechanisms for ensuring accountability have been instituted, however. These include the Board’s Audit and Integrity Subcommittee, the Auditor General of the Kenyan Government (which files annual reports to the Parliament on the performance of each government agency, including the NHIF), the NHIF’s Efficiency Monitoring Unit (which handles complaints and performs periodic audits of the operations of the agency) and finally the NHIF Ombudsman (which receives and mediates complaints).
Implementing partners and development partners aid the MOH in implementing health plans by providing services such as funding, specialized care, research, training or health insurance. The majority of them are parastatals who receive a portion of their annual funds from the Government of Kenya and have to raise the other part themselves through cost sharing or other sources, such as the National Hospital Insurance Fund, the Kenyatta National Hospital, and Kenya Medical Research Institute, though they can also be private organizations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philippines: PhilHealth |
|
|
|
|
|
The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. Read full sectionThe scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. PhilHealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| India: Rajiv Aarogyasri |
|
|
|
|
Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. Read full sectionAarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. The administrative structure of Aarogyasri is comprised of four main organizations:
The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in operationalizing Aarogyasri:
Rajiv AarogyasriInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration:
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: State Government
Operations Responsibility: State Government, Commercial insurers
Oversight Responsibility: State Government Aarogyasri is managed by the Aarogyasri Healthcare Trust, a body that is responsible for overseeing the entire insurance program, including certain administrative functions such as setting benefits packages and pricing, managing contracts with insurer(s) and in-network providers, approving claims and monitoring of the scheme. The administrative structure of Aarogyasri is comprised of four main organizations:
The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in operationalizing Aarogyasri:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. Read full sectionThe Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning. At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).
Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary. In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote. Unified Health System (SUS)Institutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Central Government, State Government, District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: State Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government, State Government The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning. At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).
Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary. In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote. |
Source: National Hospital Insurance Fund
The Kenyan health system is administered from the top down by the Ministry of Health (MOH), which was broken into two Ministries after the post-election turmoil of 2007: the Ministry of Medical Services, and the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Kenya has a Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) to coordinate and support the health care system, which incorporates health partners on all levels. The role of the central government is to formulate policy, set priorities, budget and allocate resources, and regulate service provision through a decentralized framework. Provinces, districts and local community areas are increasingly responsible for implementation and day to day management of the health system.