The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.
Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.
| Program | Key Actors in Insurance Administration | Organizational Structure | Collections Responsibility | Operations Responsibility | Oversight Responsibility | Institutional structures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. Read full sectionIn 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. General System of Social Security in HealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Commercial insurers
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Operations Responsibility: Commercial insurers
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs. The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs. Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues. The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia: Jamkesmas |
|
|
|
|
|
Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. Read full sectionPresently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. JamkesmasInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government, Commercial insurers
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator. A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:
LR = long run; SR = short run Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ghana: National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) |
|
|
|
|
|
The National Health Insurance Authority is the national governing body of the NHIS. Each DWMHI scheme is managed by a Board, which is elected by a General Assembly comprised of Community Health Insurance Committee (CHIC) representatives. Monitoring is carried out at all levels, including by the NHIS, district schemes, and health care providers. Read full sectionThe National Health Insurance Authority is the national governing body of the NHIS. Each DWMHI scheme is managed by a Board, which is elected by a General Assembly comprised of Community Health Insurance Committee (CHIC) representatives. Monitoring is carried out at all levels, including by the NHIS, district schemes, and health care providers. See Figure 1 below for an illustrative depiction of the institutional structure of the NHIS.
Its mandate is “to secure the implementation of a national health insurance policy that ensures basic healthcare services to all residents.” Section 3 of the Act establishes the governing body of the Authority, known as the National Health Insurance Council (NHIC), which administers the National Health Insurance Fund. The President of Ghana is given sole power to appoint the chairperson and members of the Council. CHIC representatives represent geographically determined ‘Health Insurance Communities’ within each district. The CHIC exists officially to oversee the collection of contributions within its designated Health Insurance Community, to supervise the deposit of these into the District Health Insurance Fund, and to represent community interests in the management structures of the DWMHIS. The figure below presents an illustrative depiction of the financial structure of the NHIS, including sources of cash flow and the organizational structure of the management of NHIS financial resources.
National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS)Institutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Central Government, District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The National Health Insurance Authority is the national governing body of the NHIS. Each DWMHI scheme is managed by a Board, which is elected by a General Assembly comprised of Community Health Insurance Committee (CHIC) representatives. Monitoring is carried out at all levels, including by the NHIS, district schemes, and health care providers. See Figure 1 below for an illustrative depiction of the institutional structure of the NHIS.
Its mandate is “to secure the implementation of a national health insurance policy that ensures basic healthcare services to all residents.” Section 3 of the Act establishes the governing body of the Authority, known as the National Health Insurance Council (NHIC), which administers the National Health Insurance Fund. The President of Ghana is given sole power to appoint the chairperson and members of the Council. CHIC representatives represent geographically determined ‘Health Insurance Communities’ within each district. The CHIC exists officially to oversee the collection of contributions within its designated Health Insurance Community, to supervise the deposit of these into the District Health Insurance Fund, and to represent community interests in the management structures of the DWMHIS. The figure below presents an illustrative depiction of the financial structure of the NHIS, including sources of cash flow and the organizational structure of the management of NHIS financial resources.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philippines: PhilHealth |
|
|
|
|
|
The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. Read full sectionThe scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. PhilHealthInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government
Organization: Centralized
Collections Responsibility: Central Government
Operations Responsibility: Central Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services. PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector. PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years. Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses. For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico: Seguro Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico’s health system is guided by the federal government but operations are decentralized to the state level. Family premiums as well as federal transfers are collected at the state level. The states are also responsible for the provision of health services. Health system oversight is carried out at the national level by the MOH. Read full sectionMexico’s health system is guided by the federal government but operations are decentralized to the state level. Family premiums as well as federal transfers are collected at the state level. The states are also responsible for the provision of health services. Health system oversight is carried out at the national level by the MOH. The function of the Social Protection in Health Regimes (REPSS) at the state level is to integrate and coordinate the network of health care providers in order to guarantee that SP enrollees have access to the services offered under the benefits package. The mechanisms used to control the network of providers are subscription agreements and contracts with public, private, and civil society institutions. The General Health Committee, which is chaired by the Health Minister, includes the leaders of all the public health institutions in Mexico as well as experts in the field, non-governmental organizations, professional associations and the private sector. This Committee is responsible for defining the diseases, treatments, and medications that are covered under the FPGC.
Seguro PopularInstitutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government
Organization: Decentralized to state level
Collections Responsibility: State Government
Operations Responsibility: State Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government Mexico’s health system is guided by the federal government but operations are decentralized to the state level. Family premiums as well as federal transfers are collected at the state level. The states are also responsible for the provision of health services. Health system oversight is carried out at the national level by the MOH. The function of the Social Protection in Health Regimes (REPSS) at the state level is to integrate and coordinate the network of health care providers in order to guarantee that SP enrollees have access to the services offered under the benefits package. The mechanisms used to control the network of providers are subscription agreements and contracts with public, private, and civil society institutions. The General Health Committee, which is chaired by the Health Minister, includes the leaders of all the public health institutions in Mexico as well as experts in the field, non-governmental organizations, professional associations and the private sector. This Committee is responsible for defining the diseases, treatments, and medications that are covered under the FPGC.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil: Unified Health System (SUS) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. Read full sectionThe Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning. At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).
Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary. In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote. Unified Health System (SUS)Institutional structures Key Actors in Insurance Administration: Central Government, State Government, District/Local Government
Organization: Decentralized to district/local level
Collections Responsibility: Central Government, State Government, District/Local Government
Operations Responsibility: State Government, District/Local Government
Oversight Responsibility: Central Government, State Government The Brazilian health system is largely decentralized. Funds collection takes place at the federal, state, and municipal levels, with the municipal level as the final destination for resources. Operations within the Brazilian health system are managed primarily at the state and municipal levels. Finally, federal and state governments have primary responsibility for overseeing the health system, with the Ministry of Health and the state health secretariats taking lead roles. The Brazilian health system is divided into the Unified Health System (SUS), which encompasses the public provision of health care, and the Supplementary Health System (SHS), which encompasses the private provision of health services. Under the SUS, the federal government is responsible for developing national policies, controlling national regulation, providing technical and financial assistance to states and municipalities, and regulating public-private relations as well as private sector activity. The states are responsible for the regional network, as well as for supervising and providing technical and financial support to the municipalities. The municipalities are responsible for providing health services and health planning. At the federal level, the Ministry of Health (MOH) is responsible for the health sector. The MOH has counterparts at the state and municipal level which are organized into Secretariats. Each of the secretariats has a health fund responsible for consolidating the financial resources that come from the different sources (i.e. the municipal fund consolidates municipal, state and federal resources while the state fund consolidates state and federal resources).
Planning and allocation decisions occur every four years at National Health Conferences (NHC). The most recent one was the 13th NHC in 2007. Conferences occur in stages whereby municipal health councils meet first, followed by state councils, and finally ending with the national conference. The councils are formed by the following types of members: 50% are users of the SUS, 25% are elected representatives from the health professions, and 25% are elected representatives of managers and providers of public health services. The health councils are bodies of the executive branch which include the Ministry of Health, the State Secretary of Health, and the Municipal Secretary of Health. As of 2006, Brazil had 4,390 municipal health councils with at least 100,000 members in total. Most of these municipal councils were formed in 1991. The National Health Council has 48 members and holds monthly plenary meetings, organizes commissions and work groups, and has an executive secretary. In preparation for each conference, each council produces a priority-setting health policy report concerning a core subject that is predetermined by the NHC. Municipal reports are sent to the state committee and the state reports are sent to the national committee. During the last five days of the last NHC, ten discussion groups debated and voted for the health legislation proposed by the state jurisdictions. Those that received at least 70% of the vote and were approved by 6 out of the 10 discussion groups became policy. Proposals that received between 30% and 69% of the vote could become policy if during a final voting round they received 50% plus one vote. |
