Compare: Institutional structure

Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage

The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage systematically documents the reforms of its member countries and other countries that have expanded health coverage through demand-side financing. The case studies contained in these pages are brief, comparative and modular in nature, describing the key highlights and technical features of each program.


Compare various dimensions of country reform efforts using our interactive tool.


Program Key Actors in Insurance Administration Organizational Structure Collections Responsibility Operations Responsibility Oversight Responsibility Institutional structures
Colombia: General System of Social Security in Health
  • Commercial insurers
  • Centralized
  • Commercial insurers
  • Commercial insurers
  • Central Government

In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs.

Read full section

In 2002, what had been the Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Health were merged together to form the Ministry of Social Protection (MPS). The MPS is responsible for pensions, health insurance, public health programs, and other social assistance programs.

The National Council on Social Security in Health (CNSSS)—which is composed of representatives from the government, insurers, unions, employers, and pensioners among others—had been responsible for setting the UPC and content of the benefits packages. However, law 1122 of 2007 called for the CNSSS to take on a solely advisory role. As such, some of its duties include defining medications to be part of the CR and SR plans, designing the criteria by which beneficiaries of the SR are selected, and developing the necessary measures to avoid adverse selection on the part of EPSs and EPSSs.

Law 1122 passed the responsibility for setting the UPC and the content of the benefits packages to a new entity, the Health Regulatory Commission (CRES). This commission is presided by the MPS and also includes the Treasury as well as five expert commissioners as established under decree 1429. The shift in responsibility took place in order to have a more technically competent body overseeing what are by nature more technical issues.

The Health Superintendence is an entity separate from the MPS that is responsible for authorizing the entrance of new insurers into the regulated marketplace. It also supervises the performance of insurers, paying particular attention to their risk management practices. Finally, it functions as the entity through which complaints can be brought by the different actors within the health system.

Indonesia: Jamkesmas
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Commercial insurers
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government

Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator.

Read full section

Presently, five main actors are involved in the administration of the Jamkesmas scheme (1) the National Social Security Council (DJSN), (2) national government agencies, including Depkes (MoH), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA), Ministry of Social Affairs (Menkokesra), and the Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas), (3) provincial and district governments, (4) public and private providers of care, and (5) the insurer/third-party administrator.

A revised institutional structure of Indonesia’s Jamkesmas scheme is currently being developed. The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all of the organizations involved in implementing national health insurance, including Jamkesmas:

National Soc Sec Council (DJSN)National government agencies (MoH, MoF, MoHA, Menkokesra, Bappenas)Provincial and district governmentsProviders of careInsurer/TPA (Askes/ Jamsostek)
Oversight of schemeX (LR)X (SR)
Financing schemeXX
Setting parameters (benefits package, definitions of poor, etc.)X (LR)X (SR)
Accreditation/Empanelment of providersXX
EnrollmentXXX
Financial management/planningX (LR)X (SR)
Actuarial analysisX (LR)
Setting rate schedules for services/reimbursement ratesX (LR)X (SR)
Claims processing and paymentX (Under Review)XX (District level)
Outreach, Marketing to beneficiaries X
Service deliveryX
Developing clinical information system for monitoring/evalX (LR)X (SR)
Monitoring local-level utilization and other patient informationX (LR) X (SR)
Monitoring national aggregate informationX (LR)
Customer serviceXX

LR = long run; SR = short run

Note that the Ministry of Finance has an office overseeing insurance programs and carriers of all types. They also have actuarial capacity available when required.

Mali: Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Mutuelles
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Mutuelles
  • Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

Read full section

Although the Social Protection Ministry is the sole entity in charge of the three medical coverage systems, the institutional framework is different for each one.

For the Mutuelles, the National Strategy identifies a new organizational chart, illustrated below. This scheme seeks to create Mutuelles at the community or commune level, networked at the higher levels by the district Mutuelle unions, the regional federations of Mutuelles, and a national federation of Mutuelles.

 Organization chart of the Mutuelle system

Table 4 illustrates the institutional framework planned for the Mutuelle system.

Table 4: Institutional system for the Mutuelle system

CommitteeRoleCompositionOperating procedures
Pilot Phase Steering and Monitoring Committee (CPSPP) at the national levelStrategic management and decision-making that contribute to achieving the following goals:
  • Validate the annual development operating plans for the Mutuelle system, including the financial framework
  • Recruit the implementation agencies
  • Raise the funds needed to implement the strategy
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Give orientation and instructions to achieve the strategy’s results
Chairs - Secretaries General MDSSPA, MS, MPFEF

Members - CPS/SSDSPF, DNS, DNPSES, DNDS, APCAM, APCMM, CCIM, CNC, AMM, UTM, DNI, HCCT, DNB, ANAM, CANAM, FENASCOM, Health professional associations, technical and financial partners, National Federation of Mutuelles
The Committee meets twice a year and reports on its work to the Ministers of Social Protection and Health
National level Technical Committee (TC)Technical coordination of activities carried out under the Strategy Pilot:
  • Validate the training materials
  • Validate the Mutuelle management tools
  • Validate the communication plan
  • Assess the investment requirements
  • Assess the results of activities carried out as part of this strategy
  • Send the assessment of the results achieved to the CPSPP
  • Submit all the corrections it deems necessary to promote achieving the objectives to the CPSPP
Chair - DNPSES Director

Members - DNDS, DNPSES, CPS, DNS, UTM, CAMASC, DNB, AMM, National Federation of Mutuelles
The TC meets at least three times a year and reports on its work to the CPSPP
Regional Monitoring Committee (CSR)Monitoring of the activities that are planned under the strategy at the regional level. All the technical parameters, the draft laws and the organizing of unions of district Mutuelles are determined and the Local (District) Monitoring Committee is fully involved:
  • Facilitate the implementation of scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Send the evaluation of the results to the TC
  • Propose to the TC all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - Governor

Members - Decentralized government units (Finances, Social Development and Health), Regional Assembly, Regional Federation of Mutuelles, FERASCOM, cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSR meets at least four times a year and reports on its work to the TC
District Monitoring Committee (CSL)Monitoring of the activities planned under the strategy at the district level:
  • Facilitate the implementation of the scheduled activities
  • Mobilize local resources
  • Assess the results of the activities carried out under this strategy
  • Submit the evaluation of the results to the CSR
  • Propose to the CSR all the corrections it deems necessary to help achieve the objectives
Chair - District prefect

Members - Decentralized government units (Finance, Social Development and Health), District Council, District Federation of Mutuelles, FELASCOM, agricultural cooperatives, women’s associations and decentralized financing systems (microfinance networks)
The CSL meets at least four times a year and reports to the CSR on its work
Communal Monitoring Committee (CSC)Monitoring of the status of strategy implementation at the commune level:
  • Report on the status of implementation of the planned activities
  • Make decisions to remove the obstacles that prevent the communal Mutuelle from working properly
  • Report to the CSL
Chair - Mayor(s)

Members - Decentralized technical entities, ASACO, Communal health Mutuelle, local NGOs, village councils

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

For the AMO, a National Health Insurance Fund (CANAM) was set up as a management agency, with two delegated management entities: the Malian Health Insurance Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS) for collecting dues and paying for health care services. The National Medical Assistance Agency (ANAM) was set up for RAMED. The management bodies and their respective roles are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Organization and operating procedures– AMO and RAMED

Body and systemRoleRepresentation
Board of directors (RAMED and AMO)
  • Adopt the budget and annual activities program
  • Determine the annual qualitative and quantitative Objectives that the CANAM or the ANAM is to achieve
  • Authorize the implementing regulations for the system
  • Authorize the Managing Director (MD) to sign all the contracts and conventions that are binding on CANAM or ANAM for a period longer than 24 months (for CANAM) or that exceed CFAF 10 million (for ANAM)
  • Determine the organization of the Fund or the Agency
  • Approve the financial statements for the fiscal year and the report on the MD’s activities
  • Approve other investment and real estate transactions and real estate guarantees
AMO - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of the Civil Service, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defense, Associations of employers, workers, retires, MPs, and CANAM

RAMED - Ministry of Social Protection, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Administration, Ministry of Health, High Council of Territorial Governments, Association of District and Regional Governments of Mali, Association of Municipalities of Mali, National Federation of Community Health Associations (FENASCOM), ANAM
Managing Director (RAMED and AMO)
  • Manage, coordinate, lead and oversee all CANAM or ANAM activities
MD appointed by a decree of the Council of Ministers based on a proposal from the Minister of Social Protection
Delegated management bodies (AMO)
  • Collect dues
  • Pay for care services
The Mali Social Security Fund (CMSS) and the National Social Welfare Institute (INPS)

Source: Ministry of Social Protection

Rwanda: Mutuelles de Sante
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • Mutuelles
  • District/Local Government
  • Mutuelles
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government

The health system is organized on a 3-tier pyramid system composed of central, district, and sector levels. The central government is managed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and is responsible for the stewardship of the Mutuelles program, focusing on policy development, capacity building, monitoring and evaluation of operational programs, and resource mobilization. The central level monitors and coordinates technical and logistic support and training at the district and sector levels. The central level is also in charge of the payment to national tertiary care hospitals.

Read full section

The health system is organized on a 3-tier pyramid system composed of central, district, and sector levels. The central government is managed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) and is responsible for the stewardship of the Mutuelles program, focusing on policy development, capacity building, monitoring and evaluation of operational programs, and resource mobilization. The central level monitors and coordinates technical and logistic support and training at the district and sector levels. The central level is also in charge of the payment to national tertiary care hospitals.

The district level is composed of about 5 sectors, with roughly 250,000-500,000 people each (Rwanda has 30 districts in total), and at least one hospital and secondary care facility. A board of directors governs the district Mutuelle and a permanent salaried agent conduct audits and overviews. At the district level, the Mutuelle Fund manages member premium subsidies and disburses funds to the appropriate district and sector level facilities based on need and service utilization. Districts guide and facilitate the administrative, logistical, technical, and political supervision, training, and management of the sector level Mutuelles. The district level is also responsible for contractual relations with the district hospital, hospital reimbursement, and quality-of-care supervision at the district hospital levels.

The sector-level includes roughly 50,000 people, with at least one health center for primary care. Each sector has a Mutuelle that is managed by community elected officials. At the sector level, Mutuelles are owned and privately managed by their members. Sector level Mutuelle organizations adopt a Constitution and By-laws, through which they define the organizational structure, roles and functions of management, and election of organizational leaders. These leaders then determine benefit packages, annual premiums and periodicity of the subscriptions, establish conventions on care and health services, service providers and reimbursement. In addition, these sector-level Mutuelles are responsible for recruitment of members and membership collections, as well as monitoring and evaluation of local health and reimbursing health centers.

In 2009 the government created the Rwanda Social Security Board which merges Rwanda Health Insurance Scheme (RAMA) and Military Medical Insurance (MMI) with the Society Security Fund with the objective of improving performance and decision-making.

Reformed Rwandan Health System

Kenya: National Hospital Insurance Fund
  • Central Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Decentralized to district/local level
  • District/Local Government
  • District/Local Government
  • Central Government

When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly.

Read full section

When the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) was transformed from a department of the Ministry of Health to a State Corporation, the management of the organization switched to become an all-inclusive board composed of the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health (MOH), Central Organisation of Trade Unions, Directorate of Personnel Management, Kenya National Union of Teachers, Director of Medical Services, Federation of Kenya Employers, Association Kenya Insurers, Christian Health Association of Kenya, Kenya Medical Association and an additional, rotating member of civil society. In all, 2/3 of the board comes from outside of the ranks of the government itself. The NHIF board makes the primary decisions regarding management of NHIF. The Board suggests an annual budget which is then voted on by the National Assembly. The NHIF has decentralized its operations to 31 local branches and 82 service points across the country. These branches are responsible for claims processing and quality assurance, enrollment and collection of premiums (especially from informal sector employees and other ‘voluntary’ enrollees), and marketing of the program. The branches also implement quality programs alongside contracted providers, and execute most of the monitoring and evaluation programs within the NHIF.

Since its separation from the MOH, the NHIF is no longer held directly accountable by the MOH. Several new mechanisms for ensuring accountability have been instituted, however. These include the Board’s Audit and Integrity Subcommittee, the Auditor General of the Kenyan Government (which files annual reports to the Parliament on the performance of each government agency, including the NHIF), the NHIF’s Efficiency Monitoring Unit (which handles complaints and performs periodic audits of the operations of the agency) and finally the NHIF Ombudsman (which receives and mediates complaints).

NHIF Institutional Framework

NHIF Branch Structure Source: National Hospital Insurance Fund The Kenyan health system is administered from the top down by the Ministry of Health (MOH), which was broken into two Ministries after the post-election turmoil of 2007: the Ministry of Medical Services, and the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Kenya has a Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) to coordinate and support the health care system, which incorporates health partners on all levels. The role of the central government is to formulate policy, set priorities, budget and allocate resources, and regulate service provision through a decentralized framework. Provinces, districts and local community areas are increasingly responsible for implementation and day to day management of the health system.

Implementing partners and development partners aid the MOH in implementing health plans by providing services such as funding, specialized care, research, training or health insurance. The majority of them are parastatals who receive a portion of their annual funds from the Government of Kenya and have to raise the other part themselves through cost sharing or other sources, such as the National Hospital Insurance Fund, the Kenyatta National Hospital, and Kenya Medical Research Institute, though they can also be private organizations.

Philippines: PhilHealth
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services.

PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes.

Read full section

The scheme is entirely administered by PhilHealth, a government corporation attached to the Department of Health. PhilHealth collects premiums, accredits providers, sets the benefits packages and provider payment mechanisms, processes claims, and reimburses providers for their services.

PhilHealth is responsible for oversight and administration of public sector insurance schemes. It has a governing board chaired by the Secretary of Health with representation from other government departments (ministries) and agencies, and the private sector including the OFW sector.

PhilHealth also features a governing board composed of 13 individuals, chaired by the Secretary of Health, with the president and CEO of Philhealth as vice-chariman. The president and CEO have a fixed term of 6 years.

Salaries and other operating expenses are derived from premium payments and the income of the funds under management. PhilHealth can use up to 12% of the previous year’s premium and 3% of the income of the fund it manages towards operating expenses.

For monitoring and evaluation, Congress has mandated the National Institutes of Health (based in the University of the Philippines) to conduct studies that will verify and validate the performance of PhilHealth.

India: RSBY
  • Central Government
  • State Government
  • Commercial insurers
  • NGOs
  • Decentralized to state level
  • State Government
  • Commercial insurers
  • Commercial insurers
  • Central Government
  • State Government

Several stakeholders are involved in the oversight and execution of RSBY at both the national and state levels. A key actor in the administration of the scheme is the insurer. The insurer must cover the benefit package designed by the central MoLE through a cashless facility. Additionally, it acts as an intermediary between RSBY and local organizations in order to provide grassroots outreach and assist members in utilizing the services after enrollment.

Read full section

Several stakeholders are involved in the oversight and execution of RSBY at both the national and state levels. A key actor in the administration of the scheme is the insurer. The insurer must cover the benefit package designed by the central MoLE through a cashless facility. Additionally, it acts as an intermediary between RSBY and local organizations in order to provide grassroots outreach and assist members in utilizing the services after enrollment.

Once a state has agreed to implement RSBY, a nodal department is selected by the State. The nodal department designate sets up a nodal agency which is responsible for implementing RSBY. The nodal agency seeks bids from registered public or private insurance companies. The financial bid is essentially an annual premium per enrolled household.

Technically qualified insurer(s) with the lowest bid is/are selected as the state’s RSBY insurer. A state can seek bids from multiple insurers for various districts. Selected insurers are compensated on the basis of the number of SmartCards issued (i.e. households covered). Each contract is specified on the basis of an individual district in a state, with the insurer agreeing to set up an office in each district where it operates. While more than one insurer can operate in a particular state, only one insurer can operate in a single district at any given point in time.

The use of a cashless facility in turn requires the use of SmartCards which must be issued to all members. This requires that a sub-contract be arranged with a qualified Third Party Administrator/SmartCard provider. The insurer must also agree to engage intermediaries with local presence (e.g., NGOs) in order to provide grassroots outreach and assist members in utilizing the services after enrollment. The insurer must also build a list of empanelled hospitals that will participate in the cashless arrangement. These hospitals must meet certain basic minimum requirements (e.g., size and registration) and must agree to set up a special RSBY desk with SmartCard and fingerprint readers and train the hospital staff. The list should include public and private hospitals.

The insurer must also establish a separate Project Office for implementing the scheme and coordinating activities with the state nodal agency in the state capital. The insurer will have appropriate people in their own/TPA, state, and district offices to perform the following functions:

  • Operate a 24-hour toll free call center
  • Manage district kiosks for post issuance modifications to SmartCards
  • Management info system functions, including collecting, collating, and reporting data on a real time basis
  • Generating reports, in predefined format, at periodic intervals, as decided between insurer and state nodal agency
  • IT related functions which include running the local website/updating data regularly
  • Pre-authorization function for non-package surgical interventions
  • Claims settlement
  • Organizing Health camps
  • Publicity for enrollment and post-enrollment
  • Grievance and dispute resolution
  • Feedback functions

As of January 2010, eleven public and private insurance companies were engaged in insuring RSBY beneficiaries across 23 states.

Since in the initial phases of RSBY, the focus was on stabilizing processes and operations, insurer contracts were set for one year. Now that processes and basic operations have been ironed out and stabilized, the contract period has been extended to a maximum period of three years. However, even three year contracts are subject to annual renewal based on insurer performance, with annual performance goals defined by the government at the time of initial contract signing.

The table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of all organizations involved in operationalizing RSBY at the state and national level:

Central GovtState Nodal AgencyInsurer/TPANGOs/Other PartnersProviders of Care
Oversight of schemeXX
Financing schemeXX
Setting parameters (benefits package, empanelment criteria, BPL criteria, etc.)XX
Hardware specifications (e.g, systems, SmartCard, etc.)X
Contract management with InsurerX
Accreditation/Empanelment of providers X
Collecting Registration FeesX
EnrollmentXXX
Financial management/planningXX
Actuarial analysisX
Setting rate schedules for services/reimbursement ratesXX
Claims processing and paymentX
Outreach, Marketing to beneficiariesXXX
Service deliveryX
Developing clinical information system for monitoring/evalXX
Monitoring state-level utilization and other patient informationXXX
Monitoring national RSBY informationX
Customer serviceX X X
TrainingXXX
Thailand: Universal Coverage Scheme
  • Central Government
  • Centralized
  • Central Government
  • Central Government
  • Central Government

UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board.

Read full section

UCS is managed and overseen by the National Health Security Office (NHSO), an autonomous agency that was established by the National Health Security Act of 2002. The scheme also has a National Health Security Board within the NHSO, chaired by the Minister of Public Health. Copayments, benefits package, standards guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are all decided by Board. Furthermore, the NHSO has regional and provincial branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests.

Governance in the Thai public health insurance system is fragmented. The National Health Security Office manages and oversees the UCS, while the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Labor oversee the other public insurance schemes as well as the private insurance market. The figure below presents a snapshot of the governance structure of Thai public insurance.

Thailand, the Health Insurance Model, 2007

While there are no standardized coding and reporting systems among Thai health care facilities and among insurers, the various public health insurance schemes have joined an initiative to integrate utilization databases among the schemes to develop statistical analysis of utilization activity, planning and monitoring processes.

The National Health Security Board has autonomy by law to steer overall management of the scheme. Co-payments, benefits package, standard guidelines, quality standards, contract processes, and payment mechanisms are decided by Board. There is a Standard Board which is responsible to prepare quality standards and oversee beneficiary complaints and grievances.

The UCS has its own IT infrastructure. While the clinical information system of the UCS is similar to other schemes, it is not identical. The UCS has also developed specific applications for health facilities to collect data for reimbursement in specific disease management programs (e.g. leukemia, diabetic mellitus, HIV/AIDS, etc.).

The UCS also has dedicated customer service facilities including a dedicated call centre. Branch offices and the call centre are available to beneficiaries to answer questions and request. Complaints and grievances are reviewed at branch offices and at the central office. Finally, outstanding grievances are decided in a subcommittee of the Standard Board.

The NHSO has regional branches offices and province branch offices to handle beneficiary questions and requests.